discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. County of Nicollet (2×) See Foster v. United States, 183 F.Supp. 524 (D.N.M.1959), aff'd, 280 F.2d 431 (1960) (failure to place guardrail on bridge over canal not within discretionary function exception); State v. Webster, 88 Nev. 690, 694 , 504 P.2d 1316, 1319 (1972) ("[w]here a railing or barrier is reasonably necessary for the security of travelers on the street, which from its nature would otherwise be unsafe, and the erection of which would have prevented the injury, it is actionable negligence not to construct and maintain such railing or barrier") (quoting Pardini v. City of Reno, 50 Nev. 392, 401 , 263 P. 768…

discussed Cited "see" Morris v. United States See Foster v. United States, 183 F.Supp. 524 (D.N.M.1959), aff'd without written opinion, for the reasons stated in the trial court’s memorandum opinion in 280 F.2d 431 (10th Cir.1960), in which it was held that the government’s alleged negligence in failing to place guardrails on a bridge across a canal and an alleged failure to keep a fence on the side of the canal do not fall within the exceptions of Section 2680(a).

cited Cited "see" John Edwin Byers v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas See Byers v. Hand, 10 Cir., 280 F.2d 431 ; Byers v. Hand, 190 Kan. 438 , 375 P.2d 636 ; Byers v. Parker, 374 U.S. 823 , 83 S.Ct. 1892 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1081 .

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cameron Smith by His Next Friend, E. J. Smith v. United States See, e. g., Foster v. United States, 183 F.Supp. 524, 526, 528 (D.N.M.), aff’d per curiam, 280 F.2d 431 (10th Cir.); United States v. White, 211 F.2d 79, 82 (9th Cir.); Bulloch v. United States, 133 F.Supp. 885, 888-89 (D.Utah); Worley v. United States, 119 F.Supp. 719, 720-21 (D.Or.).