George Saba & Lucas Nick Angelus v. United States, 283 F.2d 244 (5th Cir. 1960). · Go Syfert
George Saba & Lucas Nick Angelus v. United States, 283 F.2d 244 (5th Cir. 1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Julian Ralph Robinson v. United States (ca5, 1964-08-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Julian Ralph Robinson v. United States
5th Cir. · 1964 · confidence medium
We must still inquire whether this alleged variance did indeed result in depriving the appellant of his “substantial Tights.” In Padgett v. United States, 283 F.2d 244, 245 (C.A.5th, 1960) we repeated our ruling in Jolley v. United States, 5 Cir., 232 F.2d 83, 88 (1956), as follows: '“If more than one conspiracy was proved, -of at least one of which the appellant was guilty, it is clear that there was no variance affecting his substantial rights.” We say the same here.
George Saba and Lucas Nick Angelus
v.
United States
227_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 12, 1960.
283 F.2d 244
Published

283 F.2d 244

George SABA and Lucas Nick Angelus, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 227 Misc.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

October 12, 1960.

J. Edward Worton, Miami, Fla., for appellants.

Edith House, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal is from an order denying motions of the appellants to suppress and for return of property seized, incident to the arrest of appellants for offenses presently being prosecuted by criminal information. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the judgment of the district court was interlocutory and not appealable. We agree. See Zacarias v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 261 F.2d 416, certiorari denied 359 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 650, 3 L.Ed.2d 637; Peterson v. United States, 1958, 5 Cir., 260 F.2d 265.

The appeal is therefore

2

Dismissed.