Gilman v. United States, 294 F. 422 (3rd Cir. 1924). · Go Syfert
Search
Gilman v. United States, 294 F. 422 (3rd Cir. 1924). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events across 14 distinct courts.
GILMAN
v.
UNITED STATES (BOUGHTON, Intervener.)
No. 3070.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Feb 8, 1924.
294 F. 422
Robert W. Archbald, of Scranton, Pa., and William Davis, of Ebensburg, Pa., for plaintiffs in error., Andrew B. Dunsmore, U. S. Atty., of Wellsboro, Pa., A. A. Vosburg, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Scranton, Pa., and Edward H. Horton, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of Washington, D. C., M. J. Martin and F. E. Martin, both of Scranton, Pa., for defendant in error Boughton.
Davis, Eynch, Wooeeey.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

First indicating that no question of the jurisdiction of the District Court under the Tucker Act (24 Stat. 505) has been raised or decided, we affirm the judgment of that court on the opinion of the learned trial judge (290 Fed. 614), later fortified by the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Helmholz v. Horst, 294 Fed. 417, affirming Horst v. United States (D. C.) 283 Fed. 600.