United States v. Harvey C. Register, 360 F.2d 689 (4th Cir. 1966). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Harvey C. Register, 360 F.2d 689 (4th Cir. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rossi v. State (del, 2016-03-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Rossi v. State
Del. · 2016 · confidence medium
Id. at 272 (quoting United States v. Register, 360 F.2d 689, 689 (4th Cir. 1966); State v. Elder, 77 S.D. 540 , 95 N.W.2d 592, 595 (1959)). 38 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Isaac Kirkland Leevy
4th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Register, 360 F.2d 689 (4 Cir. 1966).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Smith
Me. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence medium
M.R.Evid. 1101(b)(3); Maier, 423 A.2d at 239 n. 5; see also United States v. Register, 360 F.2d 689, 689 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 817 , 87 S.Ct. 37 , 17 L.Ed.2d 55 (1966).
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Harvey C. REGISTER, Appellant
10290.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 15, 1966.
360 F.2d 689
Irvin B. Tucker, Jr., Raleigh, N. C., D. K. Stewart, Dunn, N. C., on brief, for appellant., William S. McLean, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Robert H. Cowen, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Bryan, Bell, Butzner.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The revocation of Harvey C. Register’s probation was justified, we think, and on his appeal from the consequent commitment, we affirm.

Chiefly, the grievance asserted by the appellant is the acceptance of certain hearsay testimony by the District Court in regard to his breach of the probationary terms. In this there was no error or infringement of Register’s rights, and there was ample evidence without it to , sustain the revocation. However, as the trial judge is quite aware, there can be injury if hearsay plays too great a role in the inquiry, and he will constantly be alert to the frequent untrustworthiness of such proof. Of course, the infractions admitted by the probationer may always be outlined for the Court in hearsay statements.

In the argument on appeal the question arose as to the adequacy of the notice to the probationer of the motion or request for revocation. The present order may not be disturbed on this ground, but it[*690] is suggested that always, whatever form the notice takes, a specification be included of the grounds upon which revocation will be sought.

Affirmed.