United States v. Chavarria-Maldonado, 413 F. App'x 725 (5th Cir. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Chavarria-Maldonado, 413 F. App'x 725 (5th Cir. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Holder v. Cooley (lawd, 2023-07-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Holder v. Cooley
W.D. La. · 2023 · confidence medium
Id. at 2182 ; Every v. Jindal, 413 F. App'x 725, 727 (5th Cir. 2011) (citing Lewis, 116 S.Ct. at 2179 ; Jones v. Greninger, 188 F.3d 322, 325 (5th Cir. 1999)); Cochran v. Baldwin, 196 F. App'x 256, 257-58 (5th Cir. 2006) (citing Lewis, 116 S.Ct. at 2179-80 ); Eason v. Thaler, 73 F.3d 1322, 1328 (5th Cir. 1996).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Tellis v. LeBlanc
W.D. La. · 2021 · confidence medium
“Prisoners retain free speech rights consistent ‘with the legitimate penological objectives of the corrections system,’ and restrictions on those rights cannot be greater than necessary to protect the correctional interests involved.” Every v. Jindal, 413 F. App’x 725, 727 (5th Cir. 2011) (quoting Brewer v. Wilkinson, 3 F.3d 816 , 821–22 (5th Cir. 1993)).
United States
v.
Luis Rogelio CHAVARRIA-MALDONADO
No. 10-40573.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 21, 2011.
413 F. App'x 725
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Benavides, Elrod, King.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Rogelio Chavarria-Maldonado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Chavarria-Maldonado has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.