Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Reich v. Warden of San Quentin State Prison
N.D. Cal. · 2024 · confidence medium
See United States v. Brown, 59 F.3d 102 , 103–04 (9th 5 Cir. 1995) (holding that the Clause did not bar criminal charges where prisoner had already been 6 punished in prison disciplinary proceedings with a loss of good-time credit and disciplinary 7 transfer); see also id. at 105 (“[W]ithholding of good time credit ... [does] not constitute 8 punishment for double jeopardy purposes[.]”); United States v. Apker, 419 F.2d 388, 388 (9th 9 Cir.1969) (holding that segregated confinement after escape attempt did not preclude criminal 10 prosecution for same conduct); Baldovinos v. Copenhaver, …
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Larry Odoms v. Robert Borg
9th Cir. · 1993 · confidence medium
Kerns v. Parratt, 672 F.2d 690, 691 (8th Cir.1982) (per curiam); United States v. Apker, 419 F.2d 388, 388 (9th Cir.1969) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mott v. State
Tex. App. · 1992 · confidence medium
See United States v. Rising, 867 F.2d 1255, 1259 (10th Cir.1989); Kerns v. Parrat, 672 F.2d 690, 692 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Stuckey, 441 F.2d 1104, 1106 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 841 (1971); Gilchrest v. United States, 427 F.2d 1132, 1133 (5th Cir.1970); United States v. Apker, 419 F.2d 388, 388 (9th Cir.1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Reggie Neon Brown
9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Apker, 419 F.2d 388, 388 (9th Cir.1969) (holding that segregated confinement after escape attempt did not preclude criminal prosecution for same conduct).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Maass
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Apker, 419 F.2d 388, 388 (9th Cir.1969) (per curiam) (fact that inmate, after attempting to escape might have been placed in confinement by prison officials and subsequently convicted and sentenced did not constitute double jeopardy); accord United States v. Rising, 867 F.2d 1255, 1259 (10th Cir.1989) (administrative punishment imposed by prison officials does not render subsequent criminal proceeding violative of due process clause). 6 Alexander also argues that his placement in DSU violated his eighth amendment, equal protection and due process rights.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Monte Berrett
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Apker, 419 F.2d 388, 388 (9th Cir.1969) (per curiam) (fact that inmate, after attempting to escape might have been placed in confinement by prison officials and subsequently convicted and sentenced under section 751 did not constitute double jeopardy); accord United States v. Rising, 867 F.2d 1255, 1259 (10th Cir.1989) (administrative punishment imposed by prison officials did not render subsequent criminal proceeding violative of due process clause). 8 Finally, Berrett did not appeal his conviction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lance Nevell
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., United States v. Apker, 419 F.2d 388, 388 (9th Cir.1969) (per curiam) (fact that inmate after attempting to escape might have been placed in confinement by prison officials and subsequently convicted and sentenced did not constitute double jeopardy); accord United States v. Rising, 867 F.2d 1255, 1259 (10th Cir.1989) (prison administrative punishment does not render subsequent criminal proceeding violative of double jeopardy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Boyd
Mass. · 1975 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Apker, 419 F. 2d 388 (9th Cir. 1969); United States v. Lepiscopo, 429 F. 2d 258, 261 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. den. 400 U. S. 948 *177 (1970); Hutchison v. United States, 450 F. 2d 930, 931 (10th Cir. 1971). 4.