No syfertize treatment data for cluster 8472127.
United States
v.
Chad Edwin LANGFORD
v.
Chad Edwin LANGFORD
No. 11-12332.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Apr 5, 2012.
464 F. App'x 854
Gray M. Borden, Leura Garrett Canary, Brandon K. Essig, Tommie Brown Hard-wick, Monica Anne Stump, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Daniel Gary Hamm, Daniel G. Hamm, PC, Montgomery, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Published
Daniel G. Hamm, appointed counsel for Chad Edwin Langford, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Langford’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.