green
Positive treatment
12.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jesus Salas, Agustin Negrete and Benjamin Menchaca v. Southwest Texas Junior College District
As noted, this court decided in Zimmer that whether at-large districts unconstitutionally diluted minority votes could not be decided “on the basis of size of population alone.” 485 F.2d at 1303 . 21 Judge Goldberg has written for our court: “[I]t is not population but access to the political process that determines whether an interest group enjoys the full vigor of its political rights.” Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 631 (5th Cir. 1975), vacated mem., 425 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 1721 , 48 L.Ed.2d 191 (1976).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Salas v. Southwest Texas Jr. College Dist.
As noted, this court decided in Zimmer that whether at-large districts unconstitutionally diluted minority votes could not be decided "on the basis of size of population alone." 485 F.2d at 1303 .21 Judge Goldberg has written for our court: "[I]t is not population but access to the political process that determines whether an interest group enjoys the full vigor of its political rights." Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 631 (5th Cir. 1975), vacated mem., 425 U.S. 947 (1976).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Alan A. Peightal v. Metropolitan Dade County, Metropolitan Fire Department of Dade County
(2×)
Cf. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. FPC, 483 F.2d 623, 624, 632 (5th Cir.1973); Grigsby v. Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc., 412 F.2d 1011, 1023 (5th Cir.1969); see also, Usery v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc., 531 F.2d 224 , 239 n. 33 (5th Cir.1976); Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 637 (5th Cir.1975); EEOC v. Internat'l.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nathaniel Shipping, Inc. v. General Electric Co.
Cf. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. FPC, 483 F.2d 623, 624, 632 (5th Cir.1973); Grigsby v. Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc., 412 F.2d 1011, 1023 (5th Cir.1969); see also, Usery v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc., 531 F.2d 224 , 239 n. 33 (5th Cir.1976); Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 637 (5th Cir.1975); EEOC v. Internat'l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 511 F.2d 273 (5th Cir.1975); United States v. Register, 496 F.2d 1072 , 1076 n. 1 (5th Cir.1974). .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
ca3 1991
Cf. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. FPC, 483 F.2d 623, 624, 632 (5th Cir.1973); Grigsby v. Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc., 412 F.2d 1011, 1023 (5th Cir.1969); see also, Usery v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc., 531 F.2d 224 , 239 n. 33 (5th Cir.1976); Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 637 (5th Cir.1975); EEOC v. Internat'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, 511 F.2d 273 (5th Cir.1975); United States v. Register, 496 F.2d 1072 , 1076 n. 1 (5th Cir.1974) 2 East River S.S.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
John W. Cross v. Lloyd Baxter
If so, then the plaintiffs have made a strong case that the challenged electoral scheme has had the effect of depriving minority members of equal representation, see Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 622-24 (CA5, 1975), vacated on other grounds, 425 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 1721 , 48 L.Ed.2d 191 (1976), and such a showing of unresponsiveness “is strongly corroborative of an intentional exploitation of the electorate’s bias.” Nevett v. Sides, 571 F.2d at 223.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nevett v. Sides
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Panior v. Iberville Parish School Board, 536 F.2d 101, 104-05 (5th Cir. 1976); Ferguson v. Winn Parish Police Jury, 528 F.2d 592, 596-97 (5th Cir. 1976); Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 622-23 (5th Cir. 1975), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 425 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 1721 , 48 L.Ed.2d 191 (1976); Bradas v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 508 F.2d 1109, 1113 (5th Cir. 1975); Robinson v. Commissioners Court, 505 F.2d 674 , 678 n. 3 (5th Cir. 1974); Moore v. Leflore County Board of Election Commissioners, 502 F.2d 621, 623-24 (5th Cir. 1974); Zimmer, 485 F.2d at 1304 . 61 The first approach open…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nevett v. Sides
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Panior v. Iberville Parish School Board, 536 F.2d 101, 104-05 (5th Cir. 1976); Ferguson v. Winn Parish Police Jury, 528 F.2d 592, 596-97 (5th Cir. 1976); Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 622-23 (5th Cir. 1975), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 425 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 1721 , 48 L.Ed.2d 191 (1976); Bradas v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 50. 8 F.2d 1109 , 1113 (5th Cir. 1975); Robinson v. Commissioners Court, 505 F.2d 674 , 678 n. 3 (5th Cir. 1974); Moore v. Leflore County Board of Election Commissioners, 502 F.2d 621, 623-24 (5th Cir. 1974); Zimmer, 485 F.2d at 1304 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Albert L. Lipscomb v. The Honorable Wes Wise, Mayor of the City of Dallas, Etc. v. Adelfa B. Callejo, Intervenors-Appellants
See Burns v. Richardson, 384 U.S. 73, 85 , 86 S.Ct. 1286 , 16 L.Ed.2d 376 (1966); Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 634-35 (5th Cir. 1975) (Wallace I), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 425 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 1721 , 48 L.Ed.2d 191 (1976), on remand 538 F.2d 1138 (5th Cir. 1976) (Wallace II).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brown v. Moore
This is in line with Fifth Circuit opinions, McGill v. Gadsden Co. Commission, 535 F.2d 277 (5th Cir. 1976); Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, at 633 (5th Cir. 1975), vacated 425 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 1721 , 48 L.Ed.2d 191 (1976). 538 F.2d 1138 (5th Cir., 1976), affirmed the District Court, 377 F.Supp. 1192 , and Taylor v. McKeithen, 499 F.2d 893, 896 (5th Cir. 1974).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Blacks United for Lasting Leadership, Inc. v. City of Shreveport
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
In all these years, the Ferriday Board of Aider-men has failed miserably in its responsibilities to its many black constituents.” Wallace v. House, supra at 623.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ferguson v. Winn Parish Police Jury
Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 635-36 (5th Cir. 1975). .
discussed
Cited "see"
William Walker v. Robbins Hose Company No. 1, Inc.
See Wallace v. House, 377 F.Supp. 1192 (W.D.La.1974), modified, 515 F.2d 619 (5th Cir. 1975); Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Morton, 360 F.Supp. 669 (D.D.C.1973), rev'd, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 90 , 499 F.2d 1095 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975); Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 , 695 n. 11 (M.D.Ala.), aff'd, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); La Raza Unida v. Volpe, 57 F.R.D. 94, 102 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff'd, 488 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 968 , 94 S.Ct. 3171 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1138 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. Robbins Hose Co. No. 1, Inc.
See Wallace v. House, 377 F.Supp. 1192 (W.D.La.1974), modified, 515 F.2d 619 (5th Cir. 1975); Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Morton, 360 F.Supp. 669 (D.D.C.1973), rev’d, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 90 , 499 F.2d 1095 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975); Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 , 695 n. 11 (M.D.Ala.), aff'd, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); La Raza Unida v. Volpe, 57 F.R.D. 94, 102 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff’d, 488 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 968 , 94 S.Ct. 3171 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1138 (1974).
examined
Cited "see"
Black Voters v. John J. McDonough
(4×)
See Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 628 (5th Cir. 1975), vacated and remanded, 425 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 1721 , 48 L.Ed.2d 191 (1976); Morgan v. Hennigan, supra, 379 F.Supp. 410 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. of Pennsylvania v. O'NEILL
See Wallace v. House, 377 F.Supp. 1192 (W.D.La.1974), modified, 515 F.2d 619 (5th Cir. 1975); Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Morton, 360 F.Supp. 669 (D.D.C.1973), rev’d, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 90 , 499 F.2d 1095 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975) 24 ; Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 , 695 n. 11 (M.D.Ala.), aff’d, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); La Raza Unida v. Volpe, 57 F.R.D. 94, 102 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff’d, 488 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 968 , 94 S.Ct. 3171 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1138 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Black Voters v. McDonough
See also Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 623-24 (5th Cir. 1975), noting that, in Ferriday, Louisiana, very few blacks had been permitted to register prior to the Voting Rights Act of 1965; and Beer v. U. S., 374 F.Supp. 363 (D.D.C.), rev’d on other grounds, 425 U.S. 130 , 96 S.Ct. 1357 , 47 L.Ed.2d 629 (1976), where “[t]he grandfather clause, the literacy standard, the white primary and the ‘Segregation Committee’ combined inter sese and with other techniques to confine black political activity in Louisiana to a self-distressing level.” Id. at 396. 40 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGill v. Gadsden County Commission
See, e. g., Wallace v. House, 5 Cir. 1975, 515 F.2d 619, 623-24 , judgment vacated, 1976,-U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 1721 , 48 L.Ed.2d 191 ; Bradas v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 5 Cir. 1975, 508 F.2d 1109, 1112 ; Robinson v. Commissioner’s Court, Anderson County, 5 Cir. 1974, 505 F.2d 674, 679 ; Moore v. Leflore County Board of Election Commissioners, 5 Cir. 1974, 502 F.2d 621, 627 ; Turner v. McKeithen, 5 Cir. 1973, 490 F.2d 191, 195 ; Zimmer v. McKeithen, 5 Cir. 1973, 485 F.2d 1297, 1305 (en banc), aff’d per curiam, 1976,- U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 1083 , 47 L.Ed.2d 296 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. Meister Brau
See also Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 636-37 (5th Cir. 1975) * "A legal fiction is the assumption, for purposes of justice, of a fact that does not or may not exist." Dodo v. Stocker, 74 Colo. 95 , 219 P. 222 (1923)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nevett v. Sides
(2×)
See also Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 623 (5th Cir. 1975) vacated and remanded on other grounds, --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 1721 , 48 L.Ed.2d --- (1976) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nevett v. Sides
(2×)
See also Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 623 (5th Cir. 1975) vacated and remanded on other grounds,-U.S.-, 96 S.Ct. 1721 , 48 L.Ed.2d 191 (1976) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. Meister Brau, Inc.
See also Wallace v. House, 515 F.2d 619, 636-37 (5th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Usery v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.
For historical precedent for this appellate opinion procedure see, United States v. Register, 5 Cir., 1974, 496 F.2d 1072 , 1076 n. 1; see also, Wallace v. House, 5 Cir. 1975, 515 F.2d 619, 637 ; EEOC v. International Longshoremen’s Association, 5 Cir. 1975, 511 F.2d 273 . . 29 U.S.C.A. § 621 . . 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e. . 29 U.S.C.A. § 206 . . 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 . . 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca5 1976
Id. at 388. 30 We believe that courts must afford employers substantial--though not absolute--discretion in selecting specific safety standards and in judging their reasonableness 31 Age in itself, Dr. Brandaleone stated, had never statistically been isolated as a factor because of its close association with the aging process 32 The Government's suggestion that the 'best evidence' here would have been a comparison between Tamiami's extra board post-40 drivers and its pre-40 extra board drivers does not compel a different answer because, insofar as the evidence shows, there are only two senior …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ollie Cornist v. Richland Parish School Board, Elvert Chisley v. Richland Parish School Board
See also Wallace v. House, supra.
Vicente RUIZ-SALAZAR and Juanita Almanza De Ruiz, Petitioners,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
74-1489.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jul 7, 1975.
Joseph J. Rey, Jr., El Paso, Tex., for petitioners., William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., U. S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Frank D. McCown, U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., Rex Young, John L. Murphy, Attys., Gov. Regulations See., Crim. Div., Washington, D. C., District Director, U. S. Dept, of Justice, I. N. S., Dallas, Tex., Troy A. Adams, Jr., Dist. Dir., I. N. S., New Orleans, La.
Brown, Ainsworth, Dyer.
Published
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion Dec. 13, 1974, 5 Cir., 1974, 505 F.2d 118.)
Deportation of this alien was sought under § 241(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251(a)(1), for excludability on the basis of § 212(a)(20), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1182(a)(20). We held that the forgiveness provision, § 241(f), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251(f), was available and reversed the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. [1]
As done today in Castro-Guerrero v. INS, on the basis of Reid v. INS, 1975, - U.S. -, 95 S.Ct. 1164, 43 L.Ed. 501, we grant rehearing to affirm the order of the Board.
Affirmed.
1
. Ruiz-Salazar v. INS, 5 Cir., 1974, 505 F.2d 118.