Daphne Rayne Mahone Nee Daphne Rayne Winslow v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 518 F.2d 554 (9th Cir. 1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Daphne Rayne Mahone Nee Daphne Rayne Winslow v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 518 F.2d 554 (9th Cir. 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Pulver Roofing Co. v. Commissioner (tax, 1978-09-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Pulver Roofing Co. v. Commissioner (2×)
Tax Ct. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Liberty Machine Works, Inc. v. Commissioner , 62 T.C. 621 (1974) , affd. per curiam 518 F.2d 554 (8th Cir. 1975) ; Loper Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Commissioner , 53 T.C. 385 (1969) .
discussed Cited "see" Comprehensive Designers International, Ltd. v. Commissioner (2×)
Tax Ct. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Liberty Machine Works, Inc., 62 T.C. 621, 635 (1974), affd. 518 F.2d 554 (8th Cir. 1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Commissioner (2×)
Tax Ct. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Liberty Machine Works, Inc. v. Commissioner , 62 T.C. 621 (1974) , affd. per curiam 518 F.2d 554 (8th Cir. 1975) .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Quality Brands, Inc. v. Commissioner (2×)
Tax Ct. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Auner v. United States, 440 F.2d 516 (7th Cir. 1971); Bernard McMenamy, Contractor, Inc., supra; see also Liberty Machine Works, Inc., 62 T.C. 621 (1974), affd. per curiam 518 F.2d 554 (8th Cir. 1975); Loper Sheet Metal, Inc., 53 T.C. 385 (1969).
Daphne Rayne MAHONE Nee Daphne Rayne Winslow, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
72-2326.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
May 30, 1975.
518 F.2d 554
Ely, Wallace, Thompson.
Published

ORDER

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING OF 504 F.2d 414

Before ELY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge. *

The judges concerned with the subject case (Ely, Wallace, and Thompson) unanimously vote to deny the Petition for Rehearing. Judges Ely and Wallace vote to reject the suggestion for en banc rehearing. Judge Thompson recommends that the suggestion for en banc rehearing be rejected.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for an en banc, hearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).

The Petition for Rehearing is denied, and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.