green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eisenberg v. Feiner (In Re Ahead by a Length, Inc.)
See Brubrad Co. v. U.S. Postal Service, 404 F.Supp. 691, 693 (E.D.N.Y. 1975), aff'd 538 F.2d 308 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 429 U.S. 834 , 97 S.Ct. 99 , 50 L.Ed.2d 99 (1976); Raine v. Lorimar Productions, Inc., 71 B.R. 450 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laboy v. Demskie
See People v. Savage, 50 N.Y.2d 673, 679 , 431 N.Y.S.2d 382, 384 , 409 N.E.2d 858, 861 (1980) (“[W]hen given circumstances make it most unnatural to omit certain information from a statement, the fact of the omission is itself admissible for purposes of impeachment.”); see also Chesney v. Robinson, 403 F.Supp. 306, 310 (D.Conn.1975), aff'd, 538 F.2d 308 (2d Cir.1976) (“[A] failure to testify to a fact which would naturally have been mentioned is legally as inconsistent as a specific prior state *741 ment to the opposite effect.”) (citing McCormick, Evidence § 34 (2d Ed.1973)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 13, Detroit Newspaper, Etc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Case Co. v. NLRB, 253 F.2d 149, 155 (7th Cir. 1958) (information necessary " 'to know whether to press or modify a particular . . . demand, whether inequities exist which merit discussion or correction, and whether other elements are present . . . which, though impossible to visualize beforehand, appear to merit discussion once the full picture is available' ") (quoting Taylor Forge & Pipe Works v. NLRB, 234 F.2d at 230 ); Boston Herald-Traveler Corp. v. NLRB, 223 F.2d 58, 61-62 (1st Cir. 1955); See also Connecticut Light & Power Co., 220 N.L.R.B. 967 , 967-68 (1975), Enforced without opinion,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 13, Detroit Newspaper Printing & Graphic Communications Union v. National Labor Relations Board
Case Co. v. NLRB, 253 F.2d 149, 155 (7th Cir. 1958) (information necessary “ ‘to know whether to press or modify a particular . . . demand, whether inequities exist which merit discussion or correction, and whether other elements are present . . . which, though impossible to visualize beforehand, appear to merit discussion once the full picture is available’ ”) (quoting Taylor Forge & Pipe Works v. NLRB, 234 F.2d at 230 ); Boston Herald-Traveler Corp. v. NLRB, 223 F.2d 58, 61-62 (1st Cir. 1955); see also Connecticut Light & Power Co., 220 N.L.R.B. 967 , 967-68 (1975), enforced without …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Massachusetts v. United States
(2×)
See also City of New York v. United States, 394 F. Supp. 641 (SDNY 1975), affirmance order, 538 F. 2d 308 (CA2 1976); Texas v. United States, 72-2 USTC ¶ 16 .048 (WD Tex. 1972), aff'd, 73-1 USTC ¶ 16,085 (CA5 1973) (holding that 8% air passenger tax may constitutionally be applied to state employees traveling on official state business).
Bordoni
v.
Twin Coast Newspapers, Inc
v.
Twin Coast Newspapers, Inc
75-7512.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Feb 2, 1976.
538 F.2d 308
Published
Bordoni
v.
Twin Coast Newspapers, Inc.
No. 75-7512, 75-7513
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
2/2/76
S.D.N.Y., 400 F.Supp. 1236
DISMISSED