green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Stephen Rose & Partners, Ltd. v. Togut, Segal & Segal (In Re Satellite Systems Corp.)
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Grant Co., 425 F.Supp. 565, 567 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff' d, 559 F.2d 1202, 1206 (2d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Universal Minerals Inc., a Pa. Corp. And Cambria Mining and Manufacturing Co. A Wholly Owned Subsidiary Debtor. Appeal of Greenley Energy Holdings of Pennsylvania, Inc.
Berger v. Rodman, 559 F.2d 1202, 1206 (2d Cir.1977). 10 In the present case, the ten-day period for filing a notice of appeal, as prescribed in Rule 8002(a), began on March 20, 1984, and ended on March 29, 1984.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Universal Minerals Inc.
Berger v. Rodman, 559 F.2d 1202, 1206 (2d Cir.1977).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Lbl Sports Center, Incorporated, Bankrupt. Leandra Walker, Trustee in Bankruptcy, and Lml Corporation v. Bank of Cadiz
Berger v. Rodman, 559 F.2d 1202, 1206 (2d Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Pilliod of Carolina, Inc. v. Ray (In Re Arkansas Wholesale Furniture, Inc.)
Grant Co., 425 F.Supp. 565 , 568 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d 559 F.2d 1202, 1206 (2d Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ramsey v. Ramsey
Grant Co., 425 F.Supp. 565 , 567 (S.D.N.Y.1976), Aff'd without opinion, Berger v. Rodman, 559 F.2d 1202, 1206 (2d Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ramsey v. Ramsey
Grant Co., 425 F.Supp. 565 , 567 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d without opinion, Berger v. Rodman, 559 F.2d 1202, 1206 (2d Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oceana Capitol Group Ltd. v. Red Giant Entertainment, Inc.
See Brucker v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Europe N.V., 424 F.Supp. 679 (S.D.N.Y.1976) (rejecting challenge to. approval of Section 3(a)(10) settlement on - the grounds that settlement violated the 'Exchange Act’s filing requirements for tender offers because those- requirements “were not meant to apply to judicially approved settlement agreements, particularly in .light of the legislative history”), aff'd sub nom., Brucker v. Indian Head, Inc., 559 F.2d 1202 (2d Cir.1977); Gilbert v. Bagley, 492 F.Supp. 714, 731 (M.D.N.C.1980) (“supervision of the court afforded an extra measure of shareholder…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Plummer v. Chemical Bank
See also, In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, supra, 607 F.2d 167 , where “settlement was achieved only after several years of pending litigation”, id. at 176 , and Brucker v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Europe N. V., 424 F.Supp. 679 , (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d sub nom., Brucker v. Indian Head, Inc., 559 F.2d 1202 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 183 (1977), where “the settlement was not negotiated in the early stages of the dispute, but rather after the parties had engaged in considerable litigation.” 424 F.Supp. at 688 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca2 1982
See also, In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, supra, 607 F.2d 167 , where "settlement was achieved only after several years of pending litigation", id. at 176 , and Brucker v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Europe N. V., 424 F.Supp. 679 , (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd sub nom., Brucker v. Indian Head, Inc., 559 F.2d 1202 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 183 (1977), where "the settlement was not negotiated in the early stages of the dispute, but rather after the parties had engaged in considerable litigation." 424 F.Supp. at 688 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,956 David Broad v. Rockwell International Corporation
In fact, to quote the majority opinion, "Had the parties to the contract wished to fashion such a bizarre provision, they certainly would have done so in a more explicit fashion." Ante at 950; see also at 953. 162 The few analogous cases, ante at 955-956, may support this view. 6 In Broenen v. Beaunit Corp., 440 F.2d 1244 (7th Cir. 1970), which was purportedly followed by the district court in Brucker v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Europe N. V., 424 F.Supp. 679, 688-90 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd mem. sub nom Brucker v. Indian Head, Inc., 559 F.2d 1202 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eutues White v. Fred Finkbeiner
(2×)
See, e. g., Collins v. Fogg, 425 F.Supp. 1339 (E.D.N.Y.), Aff'd, 559 F.2d 1202 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 869 , 98 S.Ct. 210 , 54 L.Ed.2d 147 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Greene
(2×)
See also Collins v. Fogg, 425 F. Supp. 1339 (E.D.N.Y. 1977), aff'd, 559 F.2d 1202 (2d Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Christian v. United States
See also Adams v. United States, 423 F.Supp. 578 (E.D.N.Y. 1976), aff’d, 559 F.2d 1202 (2d Cir. 1977).
Ekelund
v.
Richardson
v.
Richardson
76-6155.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
May 23, 1977.
559 F.2d 1202
Published
Ekelund
v.
Richardson
No. 76-6155
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit
5/23/77
1
E.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED[*]
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23