North Carolina Div. of Servs. for the Blind v. United States, 60 F. App'x 826 (Fed. Cir. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
North Carolina Div. of Servs. for the Blind v. United States, 60 F. App'x 826 (Fed. Cir. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“he doe regulations require an sla's proposal to be within the competitive range or have a reasonable chance of being selected for final award before applying the priority set forth under section 395.33(a)”
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ga. Vocational Rehab. Agency Bus. Enter. Program v. United States (vaed, 2018-12-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Ga. Vocational Rehab. Agency Bus. Enter. Program v. United States
E.D. Va. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he doe regulations require an sla's proposal to be within the competitive range or have a reasonable chance of being selected for final award before applying the priority set forth under section 395.33(a)
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF SERVICES FOR THE BLIND, and Timothy M. Jones
v.
THE UNITED STATES, and KCA Corporation
No. 02-5151.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Apr 8, 2003.
60 F. App'x 826
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: E.D. Virginia (1)

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.