Dennis Wilson v. Ronald F. Moats, Warden Richard Hawkins, Academic Coordinator Shirley Smith, Librarian, 64 F.3d 661 (4th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Dennis Wilson v. Ronald F. Moats, Warden Richard Hawkins, Academic Coordinator Shirley Smith, Librarian, 64 F.3d 661 (4th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Africa v. Horn (paed, 1998-03-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Africa v. Horn
E.D. Pa. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Westbrook v. Wilson, 896 F.Supp. 504, 505 (D.Md.l995)(prison policy of placing inmates who refuse PPD testing into segregated custody is “perfectly constitutional” *560 under Turner v. Safley), aff'd, 64 F.3d 661 (4th Cir.1995).
Dennis Wilson
v.
Ronald F. Moats, Warden Richard Hawkins, Academic Coordinator Shirley Smith, Librarian
95-6699.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 18, 1995.
64 F.3d 661
Unpublished

64 F.3d 661

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dennis WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ronald F. MOATS, Warden; Richard Hawkins, Academic
Coordinator; Shirley Smith, Librarian,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6699.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 27, 1995.
Decided Aug. 18, 1995.

Dennis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.[*] Wilson v. Moats, No. CA-95-944-S (D.Md. Apr. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel