green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mouchas
See, Seminara v. City of Long Beach, 68 F.3d 481 , 1995 WL 598097 , at *4 (9th Cir. Oct. 6, 1995) (holding that “[a] court may, if circumstances so justify, enter a protective order sua sponte”); McCoy v. Southwest Airlines Co., Inc., 211 F.R.D. 381, 385 (C.D.
cited
Cited "see"
Elargo Holdings, LLC v. Doe-68.105.146.38
See, Seminara v. City of Long Beach, 68 F.3d 481 , 1995 WL 598097 , at *4 (9th Cir. Oct. 6, 1995).”). .R.
cited
Cited "see"
William W. Roche Steven J. Henry v. City of Hamilton Martha Bethel, Judge
See Roche v. Town of Darby, CV-94-00025-CCL (D.Mont.1994), aff'd 68 F.3d 481 (9th Cir.1995) (unpublished disposition).
cited
Cited "see"
Coalition of Arizona/New Mexico Counties for Stable Economic Growth v. Department of the Interior
See Silver v. Babbitt, 68 F.3d 481 , 1995 WL 597667 (9th Cir. Oct.10, 1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
(PC) Villery v. Sanders
See, e.g., Seminara v. City of Long Beach, 68 F.3d 481 (9th 20 Cir. 1995); Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana, 936 F.2d 1027 , 1033–34 (9th Cir. 1990), as amended on 21 denial of reh'g (Feb. 27, 1991), as amended on denial of reh'g (May 24, 1991) (internal citations 22 omitted) (“Government personnel files are considered official information.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
(PC) Sharpe v. Sherman
See, e.g., 23 Seminara v. City of Long Beach, 68 F.3d 481 (9th Cir. 1995) (affirming a magistrate judge order 24 compelling disclosure and stating “Federal common law recognizes a qualified privilege for 25 official information.”); Breed v. U.S. Dist.
United States
v.
Vincent Herman
v.
Vincent Herman
95-15002.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 20, 1995.
Unpublished
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Vincent HERMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-15002.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 16, 1995.
Decided Oct. 20, 1995.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION