United States v. State Of Washington, 707 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1983). · Go Syfert
United States v. State Of Washington, 707 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Jeffrey Green (ca9, 2019-10-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Jeffrey Green
9th Cir. · 2019 · confidence medium
See United States v. Sum of $185,336.07 U.S. Currency, 731 F.3d 189, 195 (2d Cir.2013); United States v. McKinney, 707 F.2d 381, 383 (9th Cir. 1983).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Jeffrey Green
9th Cir. · 2019 · confidence medium
See United States v. Sum of $185,336.07 U.S. Currency, 731 F.3d 189, 195 (2d Cir.2013); United States v. McKinney, 707 F.2d 381, 383 (9th Cir. 1983).
examined Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Nancy Mageno (5×)
9th Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
See, e.g., United States v. Sum of $185,336.07 U.S. Currency, 731 F.3d 189, 195 (2d Cir.2013) (vacating and remanding forfeiture order even though appellant "did not raise this argument in the District Court or on appeal”); United States v. Whitfield, 590 F.3d 325, 347 (5th Cir.2009) (citing United States v. Musquiz, 445 F.2d 963 , 966 (5th Cir.1971) (reversing a conviction for insufficient evidence on a basis not advanced in the district court or on appeal)); United States v. Gonzalez, 259 F.3d 355, 359 (5th Cir.2001) (vacating sentence for plain Apprendi error not raised by the defendant, …
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Michael J. Griffin v. Samuel A. Lewis
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Cf. United States v. McKinney 707 F.2d 381, 382-83 (9th Cir.1983) (finding violation of Confrontation Clause where declarant co-defendant did not testify at trial). 23 Here, Riffe did testify, and was subject to cross-examination regarding the out-of-court statement.
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Richard E. Hove
9th Cir. · 1995 · confidence medium
States v. Monks, 774 F.2d 945, 950 (9th Cir.1985); United States v. McKinney, 707 F.2d 381, 384 (9th Cir.1983).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Darryl Vowiell (2×)
9th Cir. · 1989 · confidence medium
To determine whether Vowiell’s convictions should be reversed because of this error, we must decide whether the admission of David’s testimony violated the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment. 7 This court has held that “if the hearsay does not fall into an exception it is conclusively unreliable for the purposes of the confrontation clause ... accordingly, the verdict must be reversed unless the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Bibbero, 749 F.2d 581, 584 (9th Cir.1984) (quoting United States v. McKinney, 707 F.2d 381, 384 (9th Cir.1983)), ce rt. …
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Daniel Emilio (Lucero) Jones
9th Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 254 , 89 S.Ct. 1726, 1728 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969); United States v. McKinney, 707 F.2d 381, 384-85 (9th Cir.1983).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Claret Echeverry
9th Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
United States v. McKinney, 707 F.2d 381, 383 (9th Cir.1983).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Charles Eugene Monks, United States of America v. Gary A. Holt (4×)
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McKinney, 707 F.2d 381 , 387 n. 6 (9th Cir.1983) (Belloni, J., dissenting); see also United States v. Sears, 663 F.2d 896, 904-05 (9th Cir.1981) (admitting incriminating adopted statement of codefendant without even addressing possible Confrontation Clause problem), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1027 , 102 S.Ct. 1731 , 72 L.Ed.2d 148 (1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Richard Virgil Bibbero, Jr., United States of America v. James Paul Marshall
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McKinney, 707 F.2d 381, 384 (9th Cir.1983) (footnote omitted).
cited Cited "see" Marx E. Angle v. United States
9th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McKinney, 9 Cir., 1983, 707 F.2d 381 , 383 and cases there cited.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Neslund
Wash. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See, e.g., United States v. Giese, supra at 1195; Wilson v. Pine Bluff, supra; State v. Buckner, 223 Kan. 138 , 574 P.2d 918 (1977); see also United States v. McKinney, supra at 387 (Belloni, J., dissenting).
United States
v.
State of Washington Department of Revenue of the State of Washington and Charles W. Hodde, Director of Revenue, and His Successors in Office
78-1424.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
May 19, 1983.
707 F.2d 381
Published

707 F.2d 381

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
STATE OF WASHINGTON; Department of Revenue of the State of
Washington; and Charles W. Hodde, Director of
Revenue, and his successors in office,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 78-1424.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 19, 1983.

[*~381]1

Leland T. Johnson, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellants; Slade Gorton, Atty. Gen. and Richard H. Holmquist, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., on brief.

[*~382]2

John J. McCarthy, Jr., Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee; M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Division, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief.

[*~383]3

Before ANDERSON and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE,[*] District Judge.

ORDER

[*~385]4

The United States Supreme Court has reversed our decision (654 F.2d 570) in this case. State of Washington, et al. v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 1344, 75 L.Ed.2d 264, 51 U.S.L.W. (1983).

[*~387]5

We remand to the district court for further proceedings in conformity with the Opinion of the United States Supreme Court.

*

The Honorable Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation