Charles L. Jordan v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 726 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Charles L. Jordan v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 726 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: A. B. v. Hawaii State Dept of Educ. (ca9, 2022-04-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" A. B. v. Hawaii State Dept of Educ. (2×)
9th Cir. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jordan, 726 F.2d at 1367 (emphasis added), amending 713 F.2d at 504 .
cited Cited "see" Hodgers-Durgin v. de la Vina
9th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jordan v. County of Los Angeles, 713 F.2d 503, 504 (9th Cir.) (explaining Falcon), as amended, 726 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir.1984).
cited Cited "see" ca9 1999
9th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jordan v. County of Los Angeles, 713 F.2d 503, 504 (9th Cir.) (explaining Falcon ), as amended, 726 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Narouz v. Charter Comm, LLC
9th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Toms v. 2 Seidman distinguishes what remains of Jordan v. County of Los Ange- les, 669 F.2d 1311, 1316-17 (9th Cir. 1982), vacated on other grounds, 459 U.S. 810 (1982), rev’d on other grounds on remand, 713 F.2d 503 (9th Cir. 1984), amended on remand, 726 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1984), on the footing that in Jordan, unlike Seidman, the parties had not stipulated to a voluntary dismissal of the action. 785 F.2d at 1448 n.2.
Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee
79-3112.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 23, 1984.
726 F.2d 1366
Alan Terakawa, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee., Walter Cochran-Bond, A. Thomas Hunt, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Cited by 14 opinions  |  Published

SECOND ORDER AMENDING OPINION

(Opinion, Aug. 18, 1983, 11 Cir.1983, 713 F.2d 503)

Before TANG, SCHROEDER and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

The Order Amending Opinion filed January 19, 1984, * is withdrawn.

The opinion filed August 18, 1983, is amended as follows:

After the fourth paragraph of the opinion, the following paragraph shall be inserted:

Falcon does not prohibit “across the board” class formation in every instance. See [General Telephone Co. v.] Falcon [457 U.S. 147], 102 S.Ct. [2364] at 2371 n. 15 [72 L.Ed.2d 740] (Across the board

[*1367] actions aimed at a specific hiring practice are permissible under Rule 23). However, even though it would be permissible to form a class of all black applicants challenging a specified hiring practice, we must conclude after recomputation of the actual number of rejected black applicants, that such a class in the present case would still fail under the numerosity requirement of Rule 23.

*

Editor’s Note: The only change made by the order of January 19, 1984, was the addition of a new paragraph after the fourth paragraph of the original opinion; the paragraph so added is revised by the second order of amendment.