Tucker v. Storey, 77 F.3d 471 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Tucker v. Storey, 77 F.3d 471 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest negative: United States v. Tiangco (njd, 2016-12-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
cited Cited "but see" United States v. Tiangco
D.N.J. · 2016 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Anudu, 77 F.3d 471 (Table), 1996 WL 67214 (4th Cir. Feb. 16, 1996) (distinguishing distribution from possession for these purposes). .
Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
v.
Frances Storey, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Clerk of Superior Court, Forsyth County Cecilia Gordon, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of Forsyth Court T.J. Fisher, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Deputy Clerk of Superior Court
95-7676.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Feb 12, 1996.
77 F.3d 471
Unpublished

77 F.3d 471

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Frances STOREY, individually and in her official capacity as
Clerk of Superior Court, Forsyth County; Cecilia Gordon,
individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of
Forsyth Court; T.J. Fisher, individually and in his
official capacity as Deputy Clerk of Superior Court,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7676.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Feb. 12, 1996.

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and denying leave to file a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failing to comply with a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Storey, No. CA-95-537 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Judge Luttig would impose sanctions for abuse of the judicial process.

2

DISMISSED.

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, concurring:

3

Appellant has filed 123 appeals in this court between October 22, 1993, and today. I would impose sanctions against Appellant for abuse of the judicial process.