Leslie Anthony Webster v. Lieutenant Jones Deputy Atkinson, A/K/A Deputy Atkins Sergeant Steward, 81 F.3d 152 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Leslie Anthony Webster v. Lieutenant Jones Deputy Atkinson, A/K/A Deputy Atkins Sergeant Steward, 81 F.3d 152 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Byrnes v. Byrnes (nmb, 2022-01-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Byrnes v. Byrnes
Bankr. D.N.M. · 2022 · confidence medium
We therefore affirm the district court order affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of Cecil Varney’s request for a jury trial on the issue of dischargeability of his debt to Angela. 81 F.3d 152 at *2.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Byrnes v. Byrnes
Bankr. D.N.M. · 2021 · confidence medium
We therefore affirm the district court order affirming the bankruptcy court's denial of Cecil Varney's request for a jury trial on the issue of dischargeability of his debt to Angela. 81 F.3d 152 at *2.
Leslie Anthony Webster
v.
Lieutenant Jones Deputy Atkinson, A/K/A Deputy Atkins Sergeant Steward
95-6950.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 2, 1996.
81 F.3d 152
Unpublished

81 F.3d 152

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Leslie Anthony WEBSTER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant JONES; Deputy Atkinson, a/k/a Deputy Atkins;
Sergeant Steward, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6950.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 21, 1996.
Decided: April 2, 1996.

Leslie Anthony Webster, appellant pro se.

William Fain Rutherford, Jr., Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Kevin Scott Blair, Woods, Rogers, & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Virginia, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Webster v. Jones, No. CA-94-490-R (W.D.Va. May 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED