Tarik Ali Bey, Aka, Warren L. Williams, AKA Russell Sydnor, AKA Fathi Mahmoud v. Perry B. Jackson, Jr. Chester Zembra Denise Cameron Michael C. Hennenberg, 816 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Tarik Ali Bey, Aka, Warren L. Williams, AKA Russell Sydnor, AKA Fathi Mahmoud v. Perry B. Jackson, Jr. Chester Zembra Denise Cameron Michael C. Hennenberg, 816 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Findlay Truck Line, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund (ca6, 2013-08-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Findlay Truck Line, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
6th Cir. · 2013 · confidence medium
Transp., Inc., 816 F.2d at 678 (Central Transport III) Thus, Transport was dismissed from the case, leaving only Tank Lines before the district court.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Young v. Paramount Communications Inc. (In Re Wingspread Corp.)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1993 · confidence medium
Corp. v. Ouimet Corp., 711 F.2d 1085 , 1094 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 961 , 104 S.Ct. 393 , 78 L.Ed.2d 337 (1983), citing 29 U.S.C. § 1301 (b)(1); Central Transport, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Area Pension Fund, et. al., 640 F.Supp. 56, 58 (E.D.Tenn.1986), aff'd, 816 F.2d 678 *664 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 926 , 108 S.Ct. 290 , 98 L.Ed.2d 250 (1987). 1 In the context of this ease, the Wingspread Plan comported with these applicable provisions.
discussed Cited "see" Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. v. Centra
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Central Transport, Inc. v. Central States Pension Fund, 639 F.Supp. 788, 790-91 (E.D.Tenn.1986) and Central Transport, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, 640 F.Supp. 56, 58-60 (E.D.Tenn.1986), aff'd per curiam, 816 F.2d 678 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 926 , 108 S.Ct. 290 , 98 L.Ed.2d 250 (1987). .The bankruptcy court made a finding that: [T]he facts relevant to the resolution of the dispute between the parties were set out within the official court files at the time that the settlement was negotiated.
discussed Cited "see" Board Of Trustees Of Trucking Employees Of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.--Pension Fund v. Centra
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Central Transport, Inc. v. Central States Pension Fund, 639 F.Supp. 788, 790-91 (E.D.Tenn.1986) and Central Transport, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, 640 F.Supp. 56, 58-60 (E.D.Tenn.1986), aff'd per curiam, 816 F.2d 678 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 926 , 108 S.Ct. 290 , 98 L.Ed.2d 250 (1987) 10 We note that before a court makes the threshold determination that a company is a member of a control group and thus is an employer under MPPAA, a Fund may not collect even interim payments.
cited Cited "see" Richard W. Norton v. Al C. Parke
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see" The Mason And Dixon Tank Lines, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension Fund
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Central Transport, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, 816 F.2d 678 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 290 , 98 L.Ed.2d 250 (1987).
cited Cited "see" Mason & Dixon Tank Lines, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Central Transport, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, 816 F.2d 678 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 290 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 250 (1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Proctor v. Applegate
E.D. Mich. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Underlying the rule is the premise that injunctive relief is appropriate only where plaintiff can show a reasonable expectation or demonstrated probability that he is in immediate danger of sustaining direct future injury as the result of the challenged official conduct.” Kime , at *3, citing, Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 102 , 103 S.Ct. 1660 , 75 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983); see also Brieger v. Telectronics, Inc., 816 F.2d 678 , 1987 WL 37131 (6th Cir.1987) (injunctive relief generally inappropriate where remedy at law, i.e., money damages, is available).
Tarik Ali Bey, Aka, Warren L. Williams, AKA Russell Sydnor, AKA Fathi Mahmoud
v.
Perry B. Jackson, Jr. Chester Zembra Denise Cameron Michael C. Hennenberg
87-3010.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Apr 17, 1987.
816 F.2d 678
Unpublished

816 F.2d 678

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Tarik Ali BEY, aka, Warren L. Williams, aka Russell Sydnor,
aka Fathi Mahmoud, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Perry B. JACKSON, Jr.; Chester Zembra; Denise Cameron;
Michael C. Hennenberg, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 87-3010, 87-3118.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 17, 1987.

Before MARTIN, WELLFORD and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Appellant has responded to this Court's order to show cause why his appeals, Docket Nos. 87-3010 and 87-3118, should not be dismissed as prematurely and untimely filed, respectively.

2

On November 4, 1986, the district court entered a judgment dismissing appellant's action. Appellant on November 16, 1986, timely served a motion to reconsider. A timely served motion to reconsider tolls the time within which to file a notice of appeal until entry of the order granting or denying the motion. Rule 4(a)(4), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

3

On December 3, 1986, prior to entry of an order granting or denying his motion, the appellant filed an initial notice of appeal, docketed in this Court as Case No. 87-3010. A notice of appeal filed before the disposition of a motion to reconsider shall have no effect. Rule 4(a)(4), Rules of Appellate Procedure; Myers v. Ace Hardware, 777 F.2d 1099 (6th Cir.1985).

4

Because appellant's first notice of appeal is premature, this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Case No. 87-3010. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56 (1982); Myers v. Ace Hardware, 777 F.2d 1099 (6th Cir.1985).

5

On December 9, 1986, the district court entered an order denying appellant's motion to reconsider. Notice of appeal from that order was due within thirty days of its entry--January 8, 1987. Appellant's second notice of appeal, docketed as 87-3118, was not filed until February 4, 1987, twenty seven days late. Because appellant's second notice of appeal was filed in an untimely fashion, this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Case No. 87-3118. Peake v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir.1983). Accordingly, both appeals, docket numbers 87-3010 and 87-3118, are dismissed. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.