Jacqueline Bennett v. Ohio Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 82 F.3d 417 (6th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Jacqueline Bennett v. Ohio Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 82 F.3d 417 (6th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a prisoner must allege a personal loss and seek to vindicate a deprivation of his own constitutional rights.”
42 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tolbert v. Parker (tned, 2022-02-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Tolbert v. Parker
E.D. Tenn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a prisoner must allege a personal loss and seek to vindicate a deprivation of his own constitutional rights.
cited Cited "see" Straughter v. Eddy
S.D. Ohio · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Corn v. Sparkman, 82 F.3d 417 , 1996 WL 185753, at *1 (6th Cir. Apr. 17, 1996) (unpublished table decision) (“A prisoner cannot bring claims on behalf of other prisoners.
cited Cited "see" Lucas v. Cassidy
S.D. Ohio · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Corn v. Sparkman, 82 F.3d 417 , 1996 WL 185753, at *1 (6th Cir. Apr. 17, 1996) (unpublished table decision) (“A prisoner cannot bring claims on behalf of other prisoners.
discussed Cited "see" Hamilton v. Hamilton (In Re Hamilton)
E.D. Ark. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bonfiglio v. Harkema Associates, Inc., 171 B.R. 245, 251 (E.D.Mich.1994), affirmed, In re Bonfiglio, 82 F.3d 417 , 1996 WL 156690 (6th Cir.1996). $10,84-0 for Horses and Tack Next, Hamilton challenges the sufficiency of evidence supporting the Bankruptcy Court’s factual findings regarding the fair market value of Appellee’s property, which triggers the clear error standard of review. “‘To be clearly erroneous, a decision must strike [the reviewing court] as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must ... strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Smith, Unpublished Decision (4-14-2005)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Boggs v. Brigano (C.A.6, 1996), 82 F.3d 417 , quoting Mueller Kirkpatrick, Evidence § 6.58, at 662 ("[a]ppropriate impeachment by contradiction includes presenting `testimony by another witness that (if credited) rebuts or undercuts or limits, or raises doubts about * * * the testimony by an earlier witness * * * even though it amounts to `extrinsic evidence')". {¶ 39} A party, however, may not introduce extrinsic evidence of contradiction on merely "collateral matters." State v. Kehn (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 11 , 17 ("evidence correctly excluded because it would have created a dispu…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Steier v. Best
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
The willful and malicious standard is a stringent one, and “debts arising from recklessly or negligently inflicted injuries do not fall within the compass of § 523(a)(6).” Kawaauhau v. Geiger, 523 U.S. 57, 64 , 118 S.Ct. 974 , 140 L.Ed.2d 90 (1998); see also In re Bonfiglio, 82 F.3d 417 , 1996 WL 156690, at *4 (6th Cir. Apr.3, 1996) (per curiam) (referring to “the rigorous standards for withholding discharge” under § 523(a)(6)).
Jacqueline Bennett
v.
Ohio Public Utilities Commission
94-3727.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Apr 8, 1996.
82 F.3d 417
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 63%
Citer courts: E.D. Tennessee (1)

82 F.3d 417

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Jacqueline BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OHIO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-3727.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 8, 1996.

Before: NORRIS and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges; and WELLS, District Judge.[*]

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

1

Plaintiff, Jacqueline Bennett, appeals from a portion of the order of the district court that granted summary judgment to defendant, Ohio Public Utilities Commission. Her appeal concerns the propriety of the district court's disposition of her claim of discrimination lodged pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

2

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant.

3

As the reasons why judgment should be entered for defendant have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a full written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its Opinion and Order dated June 7, 1994.

*

The Honorable Lesley Brooks Wells, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation