green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of John Doe
United States v. Shewfelt, 455 F.2d 836, 840 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 944 , 92 S.Ct. 2042 , 32 L.Ed.2d 331 (1972); United States v. Zolin, 842 F.2d 1135, 1136 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 257 , 102 L.Ed.2d 246 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Newport Pacific Inc. v. County of San Diego
See United States v. Zolin, 809 F.2d 1411, 1414 (9th Cir.1987), vacated in part on other grounds, 842 F.2d 1135 (9th Cir.1987) (en banc), aff'd. in part and vacated in part on other grounds, 491 U.S. 554 , 109 S.Ct. 2619 , 105 L.Ed.2d 469 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Miguel Libutti, United States of America v. Miguel Libutti
See United States v. Zolin, 809 F.2d 1411, 1417 (9th Cir.1987), modified on other grounds, 842 F.2d 1135 (9th Cir.1988), vacated in part on other grounds, 491 U.S. 554 (1989); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 974 F.2d 1068, 1073 (9th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Feldberg
See the cases collected in United States v. Zolin, 842 F.2d 1135, 1137 (9th Cir.1988) (order dismissing en banc proceeding) (Beezer, J., dissenting), cert. granted on other grounds, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 257 , 102 L.Ed.2d 246 (1988.) There has so far been no inquiry at all.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca7 1988
See the cases collected in United States v. Zolin, 842 F.2d 1135, 1137 (9th Cir.1988) (order dismissing en banc proceeding) (Beezer, J., dissenting), cert. granted on other grounds, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 257 , 102 L.Ed.2d 246 (1988.) There has so far been no inquiry at all.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grand Jury Investigation
In re Antitrust Grand Jury, 805 F.2d at 168–69 (emphases added); see also United States v. Zolin, 842 F.2d 1135, 1138 (9th Cir. 1988) (Beezer, J., dissenting from vacatur of order granting rehearing en banc) (urging the Ninth Circuit to adopt this rule).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grand Jury Investigation V.
In re Antitrust Grand Jury, 805 F.2d at 168–69 (emphases added); see also United States v. Zolin, 842 F.2d 1135, 1138 (9th Cir. 1988) (Beezer, J., dissenting from vacatur of order granting rehearing en banc) (urging the Ninth Circuit to adopt this rule).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Doe & Corp.
In re Antitrust Grand Jury, 805 F.2d at 168-69 (emphases added); see also United States v. Zolin, 842 F.2d 1135, 1138 (9th Cir.1988) (Beezer, J., dissenting from vacatur of order granting rehearing en banc) (urging the Ninth Circuit to adopt this rule).
In Re Cosmo CAIATI, Et Al., Debtors. Cosmo CAIATI, Et Al., Appellants,
v.
William J. SIMON, Trustee, Et Al., Appellees
v.
William J. SIMON, Trustee, Et Al., Appellees
87-6431.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 25, 1988.
Canby, Beezer, Kozinski.
Published
ORDER
Appellants’ unopposed motion for summary reversal is granted. The dismissal of appellants’ appeal by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel appears to have been ordered by a single judge instead of a three judge panel contrary to Rule 8011(e). See Bankr.R. 8011(e). We express no opinion regarding the merits of the appellants’ argument that the bankruptcy court minute order constitutes a final appealable order. See Beaudry Motor Co. v. Abko Prop. Inc., 780 F.2d 751, 754-56 (9th Cir.1986).