United States v. Tapia-Carrillo, 86 F. App'x 749 (5th Cir. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Tapia-Carrillo, 86 F. App'x 749 (5th Cir. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (dcd, 2011-06-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2×) also: Cited "see"
D.D.C. · 2011 · confidence medium
INTRODUCTION Timothy Demetri Brown was convicted in 2002 on several charges related to his “participation in a major drug distribution conspiracy stretching from 1993 to 1999.” United States v. Brown, 86 Fed.
cited Cited "see" Brown v. Berkebile
10th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brown, 86 Fed.Appx. 749 (5th Cir.2004).
cited Cited "see" Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
D.D.C. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Brown, 86 Fed.Appx. 749 .
United States
v.
Gerardo TAPIA-CARRILLO
No. 02-51081.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 11, 2004.
86 F. App'x 749
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant US Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Gerardo Tapia-Carrillo, Bastrop, TX, Pro se.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.*

Patrick M. Stayton, the appointed appellate attorney for defendant-appellant Gerardo Tapia-Carrillo (“Tapia”), has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Tapia has filed a response brief to counsel’s motion but he fails to identify any nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Although counsel’s brief fails to address several variances from Fed. R.Crim. P. 11 during rearraignment, our independent review of the record reflects that those variances were not plain error and that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, Stayton’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, Stayton is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.