green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. James Hamilton
But see United States v. Hoskins, 639 F.Supp. 512, 515 (W.D.N.Y.1986), aff’d without pub’d op., 875 F.2d 308 (2nd Cir.1989) (permitting defendants to re-litigate motion to suppress, because they may have lacked the incentive to make a full-scale attack on the legality of the search in the first proceeding); Vestal, "Issue Preclusion and Criminal Prosecution,” 65 Iowa L.Rev. 281, 312-21 (1980) (expressing a concern that application of collateral estoppel against a criminal defendant might infringe due process and jury trial rights); cf. Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 464-65 , 90 S.Ct. 118…
cited
Cited "see"
Crowthers McCall Pattern, Inc. v. Lewis
See Truglia v. KFC Corp., 692 F.Supp. 271, 275 (S.D.N.Y.1988), aff'd, 875 F.2d 308 (2d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jafari v. Wally Findlay Galleries
See Truglia v. KFC Corp., 692 F.Supp. 271, 276 (S.D.N.Y.1988), aff 'd without op., Truglia v. KFC Corp., 875 F.2d 308 (2d Cir.1989); see also Schneider v. Dumbarton Developers, Inc., 767 F.2d 1007, 1014 (D.C.Cir.1985) (“we find that the [buyers] failed to pay the *68 seller any money ... indeed it is difficult to imagine anything more material”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Municipal Capital Appreciation Partners I, L.P. v. Page
See also Truglia v. KFC Corp., 692 F.Supp. 271, 276 (S.D.N.Y.1988), aff'd without op., 875 F.2d 308 (2d Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hartsell
See United States v. Unimex, Inc., 991 F.2d 546, 550 (9th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Hoskins, 639 F.Supp. 512, 514 (W.D.N.Y. 1986), aff'd 875 F.2d 308 (2d Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca4 1997
See United States v. Unimex, Inc., 991 F.2d 546, 550 (9th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Hoskins, 639 F.Supp. 512, 514 (W.D.N.Y.1986), aff'd 875 F.2d 308 (2d Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sonnenblick-Goldman Co. v. ITT Corp.
See, e.g., Truglia v. KFC Corp., 692 F.Supp. 271, 274-75 (S.D.N.Y.1988), aff'd, 875 F.2d 308 (2d Cir.1989); Allied Programs Corp. v. Puritan Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Museum Boutique Intercontinental, Ltd. v. Picasso
See, e.g., Truglia v. KFC Corp., 692 F.Supp. 271, 279 (S.D.N.Y.1988), aff'd 875 F.2d 308 (2d Cir.1989) (“The loss or destruction of an entire business has also widely been held to constitute irreparable harm, at least when the business has been in operation for some time.”) (citations omitted).
Schottenfeld
v.
Con Ed
v.
Con Ed
88-7827.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Mar 3, 1989.
Published
Schottenfeld
v.
Con Ed
NO. 88-7827
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
MAR 03, 1989
1
Appeal From: S.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED.