Consol. Gas Co. of Florida, Inc. v. City Gas Co. of Florida, a Florida Corp., 889 F.2d 264 (11th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Consol. Gas Co. of Florida, Inc. v. City Gas Co. of Florida, a Florida Corp., 889 F.2d 264 (11th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State of Missouri, ex rel, Chris Koster, Attorney General v. Mark Bailey (moctapp, 2016-05-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri, ex rel, Chris Koster, Attorney General v. Mark Bailey
Mo. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Companies v. Fountain City Federal Credit Union, 889 F.2d 264, 266 (11th Cir. 1989); - 26 C.F.R. § 1.401 (a)-13.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ditto v. McCurdy
Haw. · 1999 · confidence medium
Cos. v. Fountain City Federal Credit Union, 889 F.2d 264, 266 (11th Cir.1989) (stating that “[b]oth the ERISA statute and the applicable [Treasury] regulation are clear[ ] ... that pension plan funds may not be garnished”); Commercial Mortgage Ins., Inc. v. Citizens Nat’l Bank of Dallas, 526 F.Supp. 510, 516 (N.D.Tex.1981) (concluding that “ERISA’s assignment-alienation prohibition creates a general federal exemption of pension benefits from commercial creditors’ claims and preempts otherwise relevant state law”); Cody v. Riecker, 454 F.Supp. 22, 24 (E.D.N.Y.1978) (stating that E…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Securities & Exchange Commission v. Johnston
E.D. Mich. · 1996 · confidence medium
Credit Union, 889 F.2d 264, 265-66 (11th Cir.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY GAS COMPANY OF FLORIDA, a Florida Corporation, Defendant-Appellant
87-6108.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Oct 30, 1989.
889 F.2d 264
James J. Kenny, Scott E. Perwin, Michael Nachwalter, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant., Sylvia H. Walbolt, Tampa, Fla., for ami-cus curiae Fla. Power., William H. Harrold, Tallahassee, Fla., for amicus curiae Fla. Pub. Serv. Com’n., James R. Atwood, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Fla. Power & Light., Philip A. Allen, III, Edward T. O’Donnell, William J. Dunaj, Teresa Ragatz, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Tjoflat, Fay, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Edmondson, Cox.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges * . ** BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc with oral argument during the week of February 5, 1990, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion and order filed September 22, 1989, are hereby VACATED.