Johnson v. Murray, 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Johnson v. Murray, 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
73 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bakewell v. Stephen F. Austin State University (txed, 1996-07-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Bakewell v. Stephen F. Austin State University
E.D. Tex. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Preston v. Virginia, 941 F.2d 1207 , 1991 WL 156224 , at *3 (4th Cir.1991) (claims of employment discrimination brought under both Title VII and Title IX) (“We find that prospective equitable relief is precisely the type of remedy that furthers the goals intended by Title IX and that has been approved by prior decisions.”). 13.
cited Cited "see" Allbritton v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
D. Mass. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sargent v. Sullivan, 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir.1991) (unpublished opinion), reported in full, 1991 WL 160091 , 1991 U.S.App.
cited Cited "see" Salvador v. Sullivan
N.D. Cal. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sargent v. Sullivan, 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir.1991) (acknowledging James Beam but using Chevron Oil to conclude prospective application of Melkonyan); Miller v. Sullivan, 1991 WL 165067 (E.D.Pa.
cited Cited "see" Carter v. Sullivan
N.D. Ill. · 1991 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Sargent v. Sullivan, 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir.1991) (sentence four does not authorize remand on grounds that Secretary’s determination was not supported by substantial evidence).
discussed Cited "see" Harpster v. Sullivan (2×)
W.D. Pa. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sargent v. Sullivan, 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir.1991) (unpublished disposition), relying on Myers v. Sullivan, 916 F.2d 659 (11th Cir.1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. Sullivan
D.N.J. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Oct. 28, 1991); see also, Sargent v. Sullivan, 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir.1991) (per curiam); Thomas for Brown v. Sullivan, 785 F.Supp. 788 (C.D.Ill.1992); Butts v. Bowen, 775 F.Supp. 1167 (N.D.Ill.1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sansano v. Sullivan
D.N.J. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Sargent v. Sullivan, 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir.1991) (unpublished opinion); Miller v. Sullivan, 1991 WL 165067 ; Mautino v. Sullivan, No. 86-0780, Slip Op. at 3, — F.Supp. -, - (W.D.Mo.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Woods v. Department of Health and Human Services
N.D. Ill. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Sargent v. Sullivan, 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir.1991) (unpublished decision with limited explanation refusing to apply retroactively); Mautino v. Sullivan, No. 86-780-CV-W-6 (W.D.Mo.
Wilbert James Johnson
v.
Edward W. Murray, Director, Raymond M. Muncy, Warden, E.L. Booker, Former Warden, Virginia Department of Corrections, State Penitentiary
90-7133.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 22, 1991.
941 F.2d 1207
Unpublished

941 F.2d 1207

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wilbert James JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Raymond M. Muncy, Warden, E.L.
Booker, Former Warden, Virginia Department of
Corrections, State Penitentiary,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-7133.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1991.

Decided Aug. 22, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-244-R)

Wilbert James Johnson, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Wilbert James Johnson appeals the district court's order dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to demonstrate administrative exhaustion. Acting pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, the district court ordered appellant to exhaust administrative remedies and to advise the court within 100 days of the result of the administrative proceedings. It warned appellant that failure to advise the court regarding exhaustion would result in dismissal of the action. The district court dismissed the case without prejudice upon expiration of the 100-day period and a 30-day extension period, appellant not having complied with its order.

2

The district court could properly require exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Its dismissal of the action, without prejudice, when appellant failed to comply with its order, was not an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the judgment below. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

AFFIRMED.