William Washington Collins v. Tom Alexander Laverne Phillips Billy Jo McCurry J.D. Burnette, 953 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
William Washington Collins v. Tom Alexander Laverne Phillips Billy Jo McCurry J.D. Burnette, 953 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“alue and sufficiency of that benefit is a question of fact.”
46 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tavenner, as Chapter 7 Trustee v. ULX Partners, LLC (vaeb, 2021-11-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Tavenner, as Chapter 7 Trustee v. ULX Partners, LLC
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
alue and sufficiency of that benefit is a question of fact.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." First Federal Sav. Bk. v. Mount Maumee Partner., No. 062669 (Jun. 6, 1994)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
In general, the Act grants to the receiver or conservator the power to "disaffirm or repudiate" any contract or lease that the receiver or conservator determines to be "burdensome" or inconsistent with promoting "the orderly administration of the institution's affairs." § 1821(e)(1)(B) (C); see also Atlantic Mechanical, Inc. v. RTC , 772 F. Sup. 288 , 292 (E.D.Va. 1991), aff'd 953 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Germantown Trust Savings Bank v. Cheshire Management Company, Inc.
6th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
In general, the Act grants to the RTC as receiver or conservator the power to “disaffirm or repudiate” any contract or lease that the receiver or conservator determines to be “burdensome” or inconsistent with promoting “the orderly administration of the institution’s affairs.” 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (e)(1)(B) & (C); see also Atlantic Mechanical, Inc. v. RTC, 772 F.Supp. 288, 291 (E.D.Va.1991), aff'd, 953 F.2d 637 (4th Cir.1992).
William Washington Collins
v.
Tom Alexander Laverne Phillips Billy Jo McCurry J.D. Burnette
91-7153.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 17, 1992.
953 F.2d 637
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 78%
Citer courts: E.D. Virginia (1)

953 F.2d 637

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Washington COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Tom ALEXANDER; Laverne Phillips; Billy Jo McCurry; J.D.
Burnette, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7153.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 30, 1991.
Decided Jan. 17, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville, No. CA-91-9-A-C, Woodrow Wilson Jones, Senior District Judge.

William Washington Collins, appellant pro se.

Frank Parrott Graham, Roberts, Stevens & Cogburn, P.A., Asheville, N.C., Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

William Washington Collins appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Collins v. Alexander, CA-91-9-A-C (W.D.N.C. July 8, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.