United States v. Angel Nolasco-Cota, 963 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Angel Nolasco-Cota, 963 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
United States
v.
Angel Nolasco-Cota
91-10258.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
May 18, 1992.
963 F.2d 381
Unpublished

963 F.2d 381

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Angel NOLASCO-COTA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-10258.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 11, 1992.[*]
Decided May 18, 1992.

Before BOOCHEVER, REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

1

ORDER[**]

2

For the reasons stated in United States v. Redondo-Lemos, 955 F.2d 1296 (9th Cir.1992), the judgment of the district court is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Redondo-Lemos.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3