Carpenter v. Champion Intern. Corp., 972 F.2d 346 (6th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Carpenter v. Champion Intern. Corp., 972 F.2d 346 (6th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where a plaintiff alleges the deprivation 779 of a property or liberty interest without procedural due process of law, then the plaintiff must plead that no adequate state remedies exist before we will consider the claim.”
32 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Durham v. Martin (tnmd, 2019-05-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Durham v. Martin
M.D. Tenn. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
where a plaintiff alleges the deprivation of a property or liberty interest without procedural due process of law, then the plaintiff must plead that no adequate state remedies exist before we will consider the claim.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Golf Vill. N. LLC v. City of Powell
S.D. Ohio · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
where a plaintiff alleges the deprivation 779 of a property or liberty interest without procedural due process of law, then the plaintiff must plead that no adequate state remedies exist before we will consider the claim.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Thornton v. Western & Southern Financial Group Beneflex Plan
W.D. Ky. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bowling v. Missionary Servants of Most Holy Trinity, 972 F.2d 346 , 1992 WL 181427, *4 (6th Cir. July 30, 1992); McCall, 623 S.W.2d at 887 (Ky. 1981).
Daniel Carpenter
v.
Champion International Corporation, a Foreign Corporation Rust Engineering Company a Foreign Corporation Harnischfeger Corporation, a Foreign Corporation
92-1761.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Aug 18, 1992.
972 F.2d 346
Unpublished
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: S.D. Ohio (1) · M.D. Tennessee (1)

972 F.2d 346

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Daniel CARPENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation
Defendant-Appellee,
Rust Engineering Company a foreign corporation;
Harnischfeger Corporation, a foreign corporation Defendants.

No. 92-1761.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 18, 1992.

1

Before KEITH and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges, and HOOD, District Judge.[*]

ORDER

2

On July 17, 1992, an order was entered in the present case directing the plaintiff to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The plaintiff has not filed a response. The plaintiff has claims which are still pending in the district court. Absent certification for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) or Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., an order disposing of fewer than all parties or claims in an action is nonappealable. William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101, 102 (6th Cir.1978) (per curiam).

3

It is therefore ORDERED that this case is dismissed sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Local Rules of the Sixth Circuit. This order is without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to perfect a timely appeal upon entry of final judgment.

*

The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation