Spartan Plastics v. Verco Indus. (In Re Verco Indus.), 20 B.R. 664 (9th Cir. BAP 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Spartan Plastics v. Verco Indus. (In Re Verco Indus.), 20 B.R. 664 (9th Cir. BAP 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the determination of when an administrative expense is to be paid is within the discretion of the trial court.”
30 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Shihai (nysb, 2008-08-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) In Re Shihai
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2008 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the determination of when an administrative expense is to be paid is within the discretion of the trial court.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Guardian Elder Care at Johnstown, LLC
Bankr. W.D. Pa. · 2024 · confidence medium
See, e.g., In re Colortex Industries, Inc., 19 F.3d 1371 , 1384 (11th Cir.1994); In re Verco Industries, 20 B.R. 664, 665 (9th Cir. BAP 1982); In re Baptist Medical Center of New York, Inc., 52 B.R. 417, 421 (E.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Muscarello v. Blackburn (In Re Blackburn)
Bankr. N.D. Ill. · 2009 · confidence medium
(In re Verco Indus.), 20 B.R. 664, 665 (9th Cir. BAP 1982); Journeymen Plasterers Protective & Benevolent Soc’y Local No. v. Energy Insulation, Inc. (In re Energy Insulation, Inc.), 143 B.R. 490, 496 (N.D.Ill.1992).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Chi-Chi's, Inc.
Bankr. D. Del. · 2004 · confidence medium
See, e.g., In re Colortex Industries, Inc., 19 F.3d 1371 , 1384 (11th Cir.1994); In re Verco Industries, 20 B.R. 664, 665 (9th Cir. BAP 1982); In re Baptist Medical Center of New York, Inc., 52 B.R. 417, 421 (E.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re HQ Global Holdings, Inc.
Bankr. D. Del. · 2002 · confidence medium
See, e.g., In re Colortex Industries, Inc., 19 F.3d 1371 , 1384 (11th Cir.1994); In re Verco Industries, 20 B.R. 664, 665 (9th Cir. BAP 1982); In re Baptist Medical Center of New York, Inc., 52 B.R. 417, 421 (E.D.N.Y.1985).
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re Catalina Spa & R v. Resort, Ltd.
Bankr. S.D. Cal. · 1989 · confidence medium
In re Verco Industries, 20 B.R. 664, 665 (9th Cir.BAP 1982).
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re Texaco, Inc.
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · confidence medium
In re Verco Industries, 20 B.R. 664, 665 (BAP 9th Cir.1982).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Barron
Bankr. S.D. Cal. · 1987 · confidence medium
Lutheran Hospitals and Homes Society of America v. Duecy, 422 F.2d 200, 205 (9th Cir.1970); In re Verco Industries, 20 B.R. 664, 665 (BAP 9th Cir.1982); In re Standard Furniture Co., 3 B.R. 527, 532 (Bankr.S.D.Cal.1980).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Local 144 Hospital Welfare Fund v. Baptist Medical Center of New York, Inc. (In Re Baptist Medical Center of New York, Inc.)
E.D.N.Y · 1985 · confidence medium
Relying on Standard Furniture, the court in In re Verco Industries, 20 B.R. 664 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1982), reiterated the principle that “[t]he determination of when an administrative expense is to be paid is within the discretion of the trial court.” Id. at 665 (citations omitted).
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re GHR Energy Corp.
Bankr. D. Mass. · 1984 · confidence medium
“The determination of when an administration expense is to be paid is within the discretion of the trial court.” In re Verco Industries, 20 B.R. 664, 665 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1982).
discussed Cited "see" ca1 1993
1st Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy p 503.01, at 503-5 (citing In re Verco Indus., Inc., 20 B.R. 664, 665 (Bankr.9th Cir.1982) (holding that bankruptcy court has discretion to order early payment of an administrative expense)); cf. supra note 12.
discussed Cited "see" Juniper Development Group v. Kahn
1st Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 503.01, at 503-5 (citing In re Verco Indus., Inc., 20 B.R. 664, 665 (Bankr.9th Cir.1982) (holding that bankruptcy court has discretion to order early payment of an administrative expense)); cf. supra note 12.
discussed Cited "see" Juniper Development v. Kahn
1st Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ___ ______________________ 503.01, at 503-5 (citing In re Verco Indus., Inc., 20 B.R. 664 , ________________________ 665 (Bankr. 9th Cir. 1982) (holding that bankruptcy court has discretion to order early payment of an administrative expense)); cf. supra note 12.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Grant Broadcasting of Philadelphia, Inc.
Bankr. E.D. Pa. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., In re Verco Industries, Inc., 20 B.R. 664, 666 (9th Cir.Bankr.App.1982) (court has discretion as to when rent claim can be paid; apparently refusing to apply Axton’s holding to Code case); In re Baptist Medical Center of New York, Inc., 52 B.R. 417, 419-22 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd, 781 F.2d 973 (2d Cir.1986) (Court of Appeals expressly adopts district court Opinion which expressly declines to follow Axton in interpreting Code); In re Budget Uniform Center, Inc., 71 B.R. 652, 654 (Bankr.E.D.Pa., 1987) (Chief Judge Twardowski of this Court holds that an administrative claimant “must …
In Re VERCO INDUSTRIES, a California Corporation, Debtor. SPARTAN PLASTICS, a Partnership, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
VERCO INDUSTRIES, a California Corporation, Debtor-In-Possession, Debtor-Appellee
BAP No. CC-81-1212-VGH, Bankruptcy No. SA-80-01923-PE.
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 8, 1982.
20 B.R. 664
George F. Hemingway, Jeffrey H. Herman, Marshall, Bratter, Greene, Alison & Tucker, Los Angeles, Cal., for claimant-appellant., Alan D. Pedlar, Stutman, Treister & Glatt, Los Angeles, Cal., for debtor-appel-lee.
Volinn, George, Hughes.
Cited by 23 opinions  |  Published

OPINION

VOLINN, Bankruptcy Judge:

The facts are not disputed. Verco Industries, the debtor-in-possession, leased a building owned by Spartan Plastics. Verco owes Spartan rent for the period between July 23 and September 15, 1980. The trial court found this to be an administrative expense allowable under 11 U.S.C. § 503 in the amount of $10,791. [1]

Noting that “Spartan Plastics owes the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Estate of Verco Industries the sum of $37,110 plus interest and attorneys’ fees as a result of the decision of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit” the trial court granted Verco a stay of payment of the administrative expense. This stay is to continue in effect until such time as the outstanding debt of Spartan Plastics is paid in full, or until Spartan Plastics obtains a reversal on appeal of the above-mentioned decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.

Spartan asserts that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 503 and 507, it is entitled to[*665] immediate payment of its administrative claim. The determination of when an administrative expense is to be paid is within the discretion of the trial court. In re Standard Furniture Co., 3 B.R. 527, 6 B.C.D. 270, 2 C.B.C.2d 274 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Cal.1980); See also 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 503.01, at p. 503-3 (15th ed. 1981).

Presently, Yerco Industries holds a valid and enforceable judgment against Spartan Plastics in the amount of $37,110 while Vereo owes Spartan Plastics $10,791 as an administrative expense. The stay preserves the status quo pending Spartan Plastics’ appeal to the Ninth Circuit. Spartan Plastics has failed to show an abuse of discretion. The order staying payment of the administrative expense is affirmed.

Yerco asserts that the present appeal is frivolous and requestions attorneys’ fees and costs. We decline to award fees and costs in this case.

The decision of the trial court is AFFIRMED and the appellee’s request for attorneys’ fees is hereby DENIED.

1

. In compliance with a prior court order, Verco paid Spartan $202 per day for rent from September 15, 1980 until it vacated the premises.