No syfertize treatment data for cluster 2964174.
Simpson
v.
Vose
v.
Vose
Published
June 24, 1996
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 95-2110
WALTER R. SIMPSON, JR.,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
GEORGE A. VOSE, JR., ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Cyr and Lynch,
Circuit Judges.
Walter R. Simpson, Jr. on brief pro se.
Michael B. Grant, Senior Legal Counsel, Rhode Island Department
of Corrections, on brief for appellees.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 95-2110
WALTER R. SIMPSON, JR.,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
GEORGE A. VOSE, JR., ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Cyr and Lynch,
Circuit Judges.
Walter R. Simpson, Jr. on brief pro se.
Michael B. Grant, Senior Legal Counsel, Rhode Island Department
of Corrections, on brief for appellees.
Per Curiam. We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons recited in the magistrate-judge's report dated
August 11, 1995. See also Figueroa v. Vose, 81 F.3d 147, 1996 WL 136891 (1st Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (table).
Inasmuch as plaintiff did not incur any loss of good-time credits, we voice no opinion as to whether such a sanction might give rise to a liberty interest under Sandin v. Conner, 115 S. Ct. 2293 (1995).
Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1.
-2-