green
Positive treatment
Hot · 903 in 5y
Quoted verbatim 348×
359.1 score
G Cite
cited 87× by 87 distinct cases ·
…he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners.
cited 53× by 53 distinct cases ·
…he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
cited 10× by 10 distinct cases ·
…he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915(e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Roberts
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Ward
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Boudreau
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Boudreau
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Walker
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners.
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Sutherland
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915(e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915(e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge v. Office of Children Services
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915(e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915(e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915(e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915(e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915(e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915 (e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Lewis-Junge
he provisions of 28 u.s.c. 1915(e)(2)(b) are not limited to prisoners
Jesse J. CALHOUN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Donald N. STAHL; James Brazelton, Defendants-Appellees
v.
Donald N. STAHL; James Brazelton, Defendants-Appellees
00-56216.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 20, 2001.
Jesse J. Calhoun, pro se, for the plaintiff-appellant.
O'Scannlain, Silverman, Gould.
Cited by 1,066 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. California (126) · W.D. Washington (78) · D. Alaska (64) · D. Arizona (61) · N.D. California (13) · E.D. California (4) · E.D. Washington (2)
We review denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis for an abuse of discretion. Minetti v. Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1115 (9th Cir.1998) (per curiam). Because Calhoun’s complaint sought monetary relief for actions taken in the course of employment by persons who are immune from suit, the district court properly denied in forma pauperis status. See Bogan v. Scott-Harris, 523 U.S. 44, 49, 118 S.Ct. 966, 140 L.Ed.2d 79 (1998) (legislators); Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072, 1075-76 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc) (judges and prosecutors).
Although Calhoun correctly contends that portions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act are not applicable to civil detainees, see Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir.2000), the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not limited to prisoners, cf. Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order). The district court therefore properly concluded that Calhoun’s complaint should not be allowed to proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ni) (requiring dismissal of in forma pauperis proceedings that seek monetary relief against immune defendants).
We have considered Calhoun’s remaining contentions and deny them as lacking merit.
AFFIRM1ED.