Godhigh v. Dixon (M.D. Fla. 2022). · Go Syfert
Godhigh v. Dixon (M.D. Fla. 2022). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 9643577.
Godhigh
v.
Dixon
3:22-cv-00481.
District Court, M.D. Florida.
May 16, 2022.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

MARIO GODHIGH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:22-cv-481-MMH-PDB

RICKY DIXON, SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. ________________________________

ORDER Mario Godhigh, an inmate of the Florida penal system, initiated this action by filing a pro se Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Petition; Doc. 1)1 with an exhibit (Doc. 1-1). Godhigh requests that the Court issue a writ of mandamus against Ricky Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections (FDOC), because he is responsible for ensuring all FDOC employees execute their duties and responsibilities. See generally Petition. Godhigh seeks the return of his tablet that officers at Santa Rosa Correctional Institution confiscated from him. Doc. 1-1.

1 For all pleadings and documents filed in this case, the Court cites to the document and page numbers as assigned by the Court’s Electronic Case Filing System. A federal court may issue a mandamus order “to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to

the plaintiff.” 28 U.S.C. § 1361. The Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Godhigh’s Petition because the Secretary of the FDOC is not an officer or employee of the United States. See, e.g., Lamar v. 118th Judicial Dist. Court of Tex., 440 F.2d 383, 384 (5th Cir. 1971) (“[F]ederal courts have no general

power to issue writs of mandamus to direct state courts and their judicial officers in the performance of their duties.”); Lawrence v. Miami-Dade Cnty. State Att’y Office, 272 F. App’x 781, 781 (11th Cir. 2008) (“Because the only relief [petitioner] sought was a writ of mandamus compelling action from state

officials, not federal officials, the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant relief and did not err in dismissing the petition.”) Accordingly, Godhigh’s Petition is due to be dismissed without prejudice. Therefore, it is now

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Godhigh’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. 1) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

2 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice, terminating any pending motions, and closing the case. DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 16th day of May, 2022.

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD United States District Judge

Jax-9 C: Mario Godhigh, #M28779