green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“An inference may be unreasonable if it is ‘at war with uncontradicted or unimpeached facts.’ ”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 46 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca7 1984
But see Clements v. Logan, 102 S.Ct. 284 , 70 L.Ed.2d 461 (Rehnquist, Circuit Justice, 1981) (temporary stay pending hearing on cert. petition), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Mary Beth G. v. City of Chicago
But see Clements v. Logan, 102 S.Ct. 284 , 70 L.Ed.2d 461 (Rehnquist, Circuit Justice, 1981) (temporary stay pending hearing on cert. petition), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dessie v. Generale Bank
an inference may be unreasonable if it is 'at war with uncontradicted or unimpeached facts.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Smith v. Montgomery County, Md.
the sheriff of arlington county adopted the policy in 1974-75 (after one of his deputies had been shot by a misdemeanant who had not been strip searched) ...
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Maxwell
See United States v. Jacob, 657 F. 2d 49, 51 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed. 2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Larsen
Anderson v. Anderson (In re Anderson), 936 F.2d 199, 204 (5th Cir.1991); In re Saturley, 131 B.R. at 517 ; see In re Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Arlan’s Dep’t Stores, Inc., 615 F.2d 925 (2d Cir.1979); see generally In re Cuisine Magazine, Inc., 61 B.R. 210 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1986) (strict disclosure requirements provide the court with the opportunity to examine the integrity of the professionals involved and to give interested parties an opportunity to object).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Begun
See In re Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982) (compensation for special counsel denied for failing to disclose all connections with attorneys for the debtor); In re EWC, Inc., 138 B.R. 276 (Bankr.W.D.Okla.1992) (attorney for debtor was denied compensation and required to disgorge previously received sum for failing to disclose his concurrent representation of the debtor’s sole shareholder in a divorce action); In re Marine Outlet, Inc., 135 B.R. 154 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1991) (special counsel was required to forfeit all …
cited
Cited "see"
Cohn v. U.S. Trustee (In Re Ostas)
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin, 655 F.2d 463, 468-71 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied sub. nom, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Peoples Savings Corp.
See In re Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Hargis, 73 B.R. 622 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1987); In re Bobroff, 64 B.R. 308 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1986); In re Lewis, 30 B.R. 404 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1983); In re Morton Shoe Cos., 22 B.R. 449 (Bankr.D.Mass.1982); In re Byman Furniture & Interiors, Inc., 14 B.R. 230 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re French
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Smith v. Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts (In re Sapphire Steamship Lines, Inc.), 509 F.2d 1242, 2245-46 (2d Cir.1975); In re Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir.1941); General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Updike (In re H.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Rosen
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir.1941); In re Cuisine Magazine, Inc., 61 B.R. 210 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. 1986); In re Sapolin Paints, Inc., 38 B.R. 807 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1984); In re Ochoa, 74 B.R. 191 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Command Services Corp.
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir.1941); In re Cuisine Magazine, Inc., 61 B.R. 210 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1986); In re Sapolin Paints, Inc., 38 B.R. 807 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Northeast Dairy Cooperative Federation, Inc.
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Smith v. Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts (In re Sapphire Steamship Lines, Inc.), 509 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (2d Cir.1975); In re Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir.1941); General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Updike, (In re H.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,758 Nichols Construction Corp. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
Drilling Co., 683 F.2d 886 , 889 n. 2 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983). 13 Because of the requirement that the verdict be supported by substantial evidence, a verdict may not rest on speculation and conjecture. 14 Mack v. Newton, 737 F.2d 1343, 1351 (5th Cir.1984); see Fenner v. General Motors Corp., 657 F.2d 647, 651 (5th Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Gulf Coast Real Estate Auction Co., Inc. v. Chevron Indus., Inc., 665 F.2d 574, 577 (5th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Cuisine Magazine, Inc.
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Stewart v. Lubbock County
See Logan v. Shealy, 660 F.2d 1007 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
ca5 1985
See Logan v. Shealy, 660 F.2d 1007 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc.
See Matter of Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. An Article of Device
See Fenner v. General Motors Corp., 657 F.2d 647, 650-51 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Prudential Insurance Co. v. Glasgow, 208 F.2d 908, 912 (2d Cir.1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. An Article Of Device
See Fenner v. General Motors Corp., 657 F.2d 647, 650-51 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Prudential Insurance Co. v. Glasgow, 208 F.2d 908, 912 (2d Cir.1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 81-1596
See Logan v. Shealy, 660 F.2d 1007 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982). 35 We must therefore recognize that as a pretrial detainee Fisher had a general right, constitutionally protected, not to be subjected by state action to involuntary exposure in a state of nakedness to members of the opposite sex unless that exposure was reasonably necessary in maintaining her otherwise legal detention.
cited
Cited "see"
Fisher v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
See Logan v. Shealy, 660 F.2d 1007 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Soad R. Iskander v. Village of Forest Park and Zayre, Inc.
See Logan v. Shealy, 660 F.2d 1007, 1014 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied sub nom., Clements v. Logan, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982). *130 It is therefore evident that plaintiff presented a triable claim concerning the strip search and defendant Forest Park’s motion for judgment n. o. v. was properly denied with respect to that claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard Christine, Perry Grabosky
(2×)
See United States v. Jacob, 657 F.2d 49, 52 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982) (“we think [the warrant] was sufficiently particularized with respect to the items to be seized.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mazzei v. Winnecour (In re Mazzei)
Sommer eds., 15th ed. rev. 2007); see also Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 470 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Crafts Retail Holding Corp.
See, e.g., Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Smith v. Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts (In re Sapphire S.S.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCrary & Dunlap Construction Co. v. Mendes & Gonzales PLLC
Applying the willfulness standard in Downs, we affirmed the judgment of the district court, which ordered complete disgorgement of fees and was based on a finding that debtor’s counsel had demonstrated a “callous disregard” for the duties imposed by the Code and Rules by “affirmatively ... concealing] his fee arrangement.” Id. at 479-80 ; see also Futuronics v. Arutt (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 466-68, 471 (2d Cir.1981) (requiring complete denial of all compensation and disgorgement of all fees received for flagrant violation of fiduciary obligations exhibiting a callous …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coan v. Hutter (In Re Hutter)
See, e.g., Matter of Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Rainbow Press of Fredonia, 197 B.R. 428, 429 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.1996); In re Piecuil, 145 B.R. 777 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Bennett Funding Group, Inc.
See, e.g., Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Smith v. Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts (In re Sapphire Steamship Lines, Inc.), 509 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (2d Cir.1975); General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Updike (In re H.L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seven-Up Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.
See, e.g., Fenner v. General Motors Corp., 657 F.2d 647, 651 (5th Cir. Unit B June 1981) (“An inference may be unreasonable if it is at war with uncontradicted or unimpeached facts.”) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Dreijer v. Girod Motor Co., 294 F.2d 549, 555-56 (5th Cir.1961) (rejecting an inference of causation based on “post hoc ergo propter hoc reasoning” where the evidence supported several other probable causes for the accident). 15 Seven-Up offered no evi *1389 dence to contradict the testimony of Browne …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taft v. Vines
Compare Illinois v. Lafayette, 462 U.S. 640, 645 , 103 S.Ct. 2605, 2609 , 77 L.Ed.2d 65 (1983) ("the interests supporting a search incident to arrest would hardly justify disrobing an arrestee on the street") (dicta) and Logan v. Shealy, 660 F.2d 1007 (4th Cir.1981) (no qualified immunity for policy of strip searching persons detained for minor offenses), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taft v. Vines
Compare Illinois v. Lafayette, 462 U.S. 640, 645 , 103 S.Ct. 2605, 2609 , 77 L.Ed.2d 65 (1983) (“the interests supporting a search incident to arrest would hardly justify disrobing an arrestee on the street”) (dicta) and Logan v. Shealy, 660 F.2d 1007 (4th Cir.1981) (no qualified immunity for policy of strip searching persons detained for minor offenses), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re 245 Associates, LLC
See, e.g., Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Smith v. Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts (In re Sapphire Steamship Lines, Inc.), 509 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (2d Cir.1975); In re Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir.1941); In re Rogers-Pyatt Shellac Co., 51 F.2d 988, 991 (2d Cir.1931); In re Robotics Resources R2, Inc., 117 B.R. at 62 ; In re French, 111 B.R. 391, 394 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1989); In re Northeast Dairy Co-op.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Daisy M. Prudhomme and John and Kathleen Batten, Debtors. John F. Arens v. Al Boughton, Trustee
See 11 U.S.C. §§ 327 , 1107(a) (requiring court approval before debtor-in-possession may employ counsel); id. § 330(a) (requiring court approval of professional fees); Woods v. City Nat’l Bank & *1004 Trust Co., 312 U.S. 262, 268 , 61 S.Ct. 493, 497 , 85 L.Ed. 820 (1941) (using denial of compensation as tool for strict enforcement of conflict-of-interest rules); Anderson v. Anderson (In re Anderson), 936 F.2d 199, 204 (5th Cir.1991) (recognizing bankruptcy court’s broad discretion as court of equity to grant or deny fees and noting that attorney has no absolute right to fee award absent…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Great Western Coal, Inc. v. Brown (In Re Great Western Coal, Inc.)
Moreover, there is specific authority holding the Eleventh Amendment inapplicable to the counties of South Carolina. *708 Scott v. Greenville County, 716 F.2d 1409, 1422 (4th Cir.1983); see also Logan v. Shealy, 660 F.2d 1007, 1015 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Lytle v. Commissioners of Election of Union County, 541 F.2d 421, 426 (4th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 3122 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1147 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grabill Corp. v. Pelliccioni
See also In re Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Morton Shoe Cos., 22 B.R. 449 (Bankr.D.Mass.1982); In re Byman Furniture & Interiors, Inc., 14 B.R. 230 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilbert J. Sheets, Cross-Appellant v. Yamaha Motors Corporation, U.S.A. And Yamaha Motor Co. Ltd. Of Iwata, Japan, Cross-Appellees
See, e.g., Weaver v. Bowers, 657 F.2d 1356, 1362 (3d Cir.1981) (en banc) (permitting the taxing of costs against prevailing parties due to their inexcusable delay in waiting to raise a decisive issue until a post-trial motion), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); cf. Thompson v. Sun Oil Co., 523 F.2d 647 , 650 & n. 4 (8th Cir.1975) (taxing appellate costs against prevailing party because of their lack of good faith and evasiveness during the discovery process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Julia Prewitt Brown v. Trustees of Boston University
(2×)
See also Weaver v. Bowers, 657 F.2d 1356, 1361-62 (3d Cir.1981) (considered Rule 12(b)(6) motion, even though not raised until after trial, in the interests of “evenhandedness in the administration of justice”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Charles N. Wooten, Ltd. (In re Evangeline Refining Co.)
See, e.g., Matter of Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463, 470-71 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Endeco Inc., 675 F.2d 166, 167 (8th Cir.1982); Matter of Arlan’s Dept.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In The Matter Of Evangeline Refining Company
See, e.g., Matter of Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463, 470-71 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Endeco Inc., 675 F.2d 166, 167 (8th Cir.1982); Matter of Arlan's Dept.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Nana Daly's Pub, Ltd.
See, e.g., In re Futuronics, 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (denied compensation to attorneys for debt- or-in-possession due to failure to disclose fee arrangements and certain relatively minor payments); In re Arlan’s Dept.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Daig Corp.
Minn.1981); see also Matter of Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Sapolin Paints Inc., 38 B.R. 807 (Bktcy.E.D.N.Y.1984); In re Morton Shoe Companies, Inc., 22 B.R. 449 (Bktcy.D.Mass.1982). .This is equally true as to services rendered subsequent to a professional person’s termination by the debtor.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Kraft v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See also In re Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 , 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Rene Press, 23 B.R. 381, 383 (Bankr.D.Mass.1982), vacated on other grounds, 29 B.R. 446 (Bankr. 1st Cir.1983); In re Holiday Mart, Inc., 18 B.R. 212, 215-16 (Bankr.D.Hawaii 1982); In re Morton Shoe, 22 B.R. at 450 ; In re Garland Corp., 8 B.R. 826, 828 (Bankr.D.Mass.1981); In re McAuley Textile Corp., 11 B.R. 646, 648 (Bankr.D.Me.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Devers
See, e.g., In Re Futuronics Corporation, 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In Re Arlan’s Department Store, Inc., 615 F.2d 925 (2d Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Rene Press, Inc.
See also In re Futuronics Corp. 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir. 1981) cert. denied - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Holiday Mart, Inc., 18 B.R. 212 (Bkrtcy.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Wuagneux
See also United States v. Jacob, 657 F.2d 49, 52 (4th Cir. 1981) (consider complexity of alleged fraud), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); United States v. Abrams, 615 F.2d 541, 548 (1st Cir. 1980) (Campbell, J., concurring) (investigators in fraud cases do not and often cannot know in advance what precisely they will find in files).
ISRAEL AND RALEY
v.
FUTURONICS CORPORATION
v.
FUTURONICS CORPORATION
No. 81-1037.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1982.
102 S. Ct. 1435
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Maryland (1) · S.D. New York (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Denied.