Flores v. Connecticut, 136 S. Ct. 1529 (SCOTUS 2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Flores v. Connecticut, 136 S. Ct. 1529 (SCOTUS 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Spring (connappct, 2018-11-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Spring
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Flores , 319 Conn. 218 , 226-27, [ 125 A.3d 157 ] (2015) (finding informant's tip 'reliable' even though it lacked independent corroboration, [cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1529 , 194 L.Ed.2d 615 (2016) ] )." In addition, the state also argues that the record contains considerable "findings and evidence that support the trial court's determination that the state had proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant's statement was reliable.... [T]he defendant never disputed the accuracy of the contents of the statements, or the fact that he read, understood, …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hamilton
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
Those consequences might range from a loss of confidence or indulgence by the police to prosecution for . . . falsely reporting an incident under General Statutes § 53a-180 [c], had the informa- tion supplied proved to be a fabrication.’’ (Internal quo- tation marks omitted.) Id., 650; see also State v. Flores, 319 Conn. 218 , 228, 125 A.3d 157 (2015) (fact that infor- mant ‘‘could have expected adverse consequences for 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 11 0 Conn. App. 1 ,0 13 State v. Hamilton relaying false information’’ provided ‘‘indicia of reliabil- ity’’), cert. deni…
Teudi FLORES
v.
CONNECTICUT.
No. 15–8236..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 2016.
136 S. Ct. 1529
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.