Van Zandt v. Mbunda, 136 S. Ct. 198 (SCOTUS 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
Van Zandt v. Mbunda, 136 S. Ct. 198 (SCOTUS 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 4 distinct cases · …the court conducting a sufficiency review must not engage in a 'divide and conquer' strategy but must consider the cumulative force of all the evidence.
133 citation events (133 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Stevie Jones v. State (texapp, 2019-04-11)
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Stevie Jones v. State
Tex. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the court conducting a sufficiency review must not engage in a 'divide and conquer' strategy but must consider the cumulative force of all the evidence.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Victor Alonso Espinoza v. State
Tex. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the court conducting a sufficiency review must not engage in a 'divide and conquer' strategy but must consider the cumulative force of all the evidence.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Manuel Ramirez v. State
Tex. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the court conducting a sufficiency review must not engage in a 'divide and conquer' strategy but must consider the cumulative force of all the evidence.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ben Meadway v. State
Tex. App. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the court conducting a sufficiency review must not engage in a 'divide and conquer' strategy but must consider the cumulative force of all the evidence.
Thomas VAN ZANDT, of Estate of Evaline Jeanne Malis
v.
Wileharda Killian MBUNDA
No. 15-70.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 2015.
136 S. Ct. 198
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 4 cases
Pinpoint authority: #17,495 of 633,719
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (4)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.