green
Positive treatment
20.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2019 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2019
2022
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
examined
Cited "but see"
Bucklew v. Precythe
(5×)
also: Cited "see"
But see id., at ----, 139 S.Ct., at 662 (KAGAN, J., dissenting) (noting that the governing statute authorized both the inmate's imam and the prison's Christian chaplain to attend the execution, and that "the prison refused to give Ray a copy of its own practices and procedures" that would have clarified the two clergymen's degrees of access); Ray v. Commissioner, Ala. Dept. of Corrections , 915 F.3d 689 , 701-703 (CA11 2019).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Willie B. Smith, III v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Dunn v. Ray, 139 S. Ct. 661, 661 (2019) (mem.).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Murphy v. Collier
(3×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Indeed, the Ray dissent is based on strict scrutiny, 586 U.S., at ----, 139 S.Ct., at 661-662, even though Turner specifically and emphatically rejected the use of that test in prisoner cases, 482 U.S. at 89, 107 S.Ct. 2254 .
cited
Cited "see"
James v. Raybon
See Dunn v. Ray, 586 U.S. –––, 139 S.Ct. 661 , ––– L.Ed.2d –– (2019).
cited
Cited "see"
Woods v. Dunn (DEATH PENALTY)
See Dunn v. Ray, 139 S. Ct. 661 (2019); see also Bucklew, 139 S. Ct. at 1134 ; Dunn v. Price, 139 S. Ct. at 1312.
discussed
Cited "see"
CROMARTIE v. SHEALY
See Dunn v. Ray, 139 S. Ct. 661, 661 (2019) (quoting Gomez, 503 U.S. at 654 (1992) (vacating stay granted by Eleventh Circuit because of the “‘last-minute nature of [the] application to stay execution’”); Bucklew, 139 S. Ct. at 1134 (citations omitted) (affirming Eighth Circuit’s denial of a stay and stating that “‘last-minute nature of an application’” could be “‘grounds for denial of stay’”); Price, 139 S. Ct. at 1312 (quoting Gomez, 503 U.S. at 654 ) (vacating stay granted by Eleventh Circuit due to the “‘last minute nature of [the] application to stay executio…
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrick Murphy v. Bryan Collier
(2×)
See Dunn v. Ray , --- U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 661 , 661, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2019) (vacating a stay of execution granted by a circuit court when the applicant waited until ten days before the scheduled execution to file his claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
It may not . . . aid, foster, or promote one religion or religious theory against another . . . ."); see also Dunn v. Ray, 139 S. Ct. 661, 662 (2019) (Kagan, J., dissenting from grant of application to vacate stay) (describing denominational neutrality as "the Establishment Clause's core principle").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
See, e.g., Dunn v. Ray, 139 S. Ct. 661 (2019) (vacating a stay of execution on grounds of delay when the motion was filed ten days prior to plaintiff’s scheduled execution date); Woods v. Dunn, No. 2:20-CV-58-ECM, 2020 WL 1015763 , at *20 (M.D.
JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES, L.L.C., Applicants
v.
Rebekah GEE, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals.
v.
Rebekah GEE, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals.
No. 18A774..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 1, 2019.
Supreme.
Cited by 21 opinions | Published
Because the filings regarding the application for a stay in this matter were not completed until earlier today and the Justices need time to review these filings, the issuance of the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case No. 17-30397, is administratively stayed through Thursday, February 7, 2019. This order does not reflect any view regarding the merits of the petition for a writ of certiorari that applicants represent they will file.
/s/ Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
Court of the United States