Reid v. Jones, 187 U.S. 153 (1902). · Go Syfert
Search
Reid v. Jones, 187 U.S. 153 (1902). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
89 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: WESELY v. DELBALSO (paed, 2021-12-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1904 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1904 1965 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) WESELY v. DELBALSO
E.D. Pa. · 2021 · confidence medium
We may not exercise our jurisdiction over a pre-trial petition brought pursuant to §2241 if the claims in the petition have not been exhausted “unless extraordinary circumstances are present.” Moore, 515 F.3d at 443 (citing Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 520-521 (1952); Reid v. Jones, 187 U.S. 153, 154 (1902); United States ex rel.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Walters v. McKinnis
W.D. Pa. · 1915 · confidence medium
Ed. 868 , Reid v. Jones, 187 U. S. 153 , 23 Sup. Ct. 89, 47 L.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Ex parte Bartlett
E.D. Wis. · 1912 · confidence medium
Ed. 639 , Reid v. Jones, 187 U. S. 153 , 23 Sup. Ct. 89, 47 L.
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States ex rel. Jorczak v. Ragen (3×)
7th Cir. · 1939 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Reid v. Jones, Sheriff, 187 U.S. 153 , 23 S.Ct. 89 , 47 L.Ed. 116 ; In re Walter J.
Reid
v.
Jones
147.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1902.
187 U.S. 153
Mr. John K. Denison and Mr. William M. Springer for appellant., Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for appellee. Mr. Charles C. Post, attorney general of the State of Colorado, was with him on the brief.
Harlan.
Cited by 41 opinions  |  Published
[*154] Me. Justice Haelah

delivered the opinion of the court.

After the appellant Eeid had been convicted and sentenced, as shown in the case just decided, he was arrested upon a mit-timus sued out by the State. He immediately obtained a writ of habeas corpus from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. But that court, upon hearing, remanded the prisoner to the custody of the State authorities, and dismissed his application to be discharged. He thereupon prayed and was allowed an appeal to this court.

The merits of this case have been fully considered in case No. 269, Reid v. Colorado, ante, 137. But if this had not been, we should dismiss the present appeal; for, one convicted in a State court for an alleged violation of the criminal statutes of the State, and who contends that he is held in violation of the Constitution of the United States, must ordinarily first take his case to the highest court of the State, in which the judgment could be reviewed, and thence bring it, if unsuccessful there, to this court by writ of error; that only in certain exceptional cases, of which the present is not one, will a Circuit Court of •the Unitéd States, or this court upon appeal from a Circuit Court, intervene by writ of habeas corpus in advance of the final action by the highest court of the State. Ex parte Royall, 117 U. S. 241, 251; New York v. Eno, 155 U. S. 89; Minnesota v. Brundage, 180 U. S. 499, 502, and authorities cited.

The judgment is

Affirmed.