green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1908 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1908
1967
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Canadian Javelin Ltd. v. Brooks
SEC v. Topping, 85 F.Supp. 63, 64 (SDNY 1949), (stating that “any writings which are part of a continuous plan ending in solicitation and which prepare the way for its success” are within the scope of the Proxy Rules); see SEC v. Okin, 132 F.2d 784, 786 (2d Cir. 1943) and Halsted v. SEC, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 352, 354-355 , 182 F.2d 660, 662-3 (1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 834 , 71 S.Ct. 68 , 95 L.Ed. 612 (wherein the courts construed the proxy solicitation requirements of the Public Utilities Holding Act to govern solicitations that were not in proxy form); see also Greater Iowa Corp. v. McLen…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re First Home Investment Corp. of Kansas, Inc.
See Section 221(4) and Leiman v. Guttman, 336 U.S. 1 , 69 S.Ct. 371 , 93 L.Ed. 453 (1948) and Halsted v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 352 , 182 F.2d 660 (1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 834 , 71 S.Ct. 68 , 95 L.Ed. 612 . 4.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca8 1982
See, e.g., Forgett v. Scharf, 181 F.2d 754, 787 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 825 , 71 S.Ct. 59 , 95 L.Ed. 606 (1950); 3 Von Kalinowski, supra, § 9.02(4).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Alexander v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.
See, e.g., Forgett v. Scharf, 181 F.2d 754, 787 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 825 , 71 S.Ct. 59 , 95 L.Ed. 606 (1950); 3 Von Kalinowski, supra, § 9.02[4].
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tv Signal Company of Aberdeen, a Corporation v. American Telephone & Telegraph, a Corporation, and Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation
See also Forgett v. Scharf, 181 F.2d 754, 757 (3d Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 825 , 71 S.Ct. 59 , 95 L.Ed. 606 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles W. STEADMAN, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent
See, e. g., In re Fisher, 179 F.2d 361, 369-70 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 825 , 71 S.Ct. 59 , 95 L.Ed. 606 (1950).
Willumeit
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 191.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1950.
Joseph W. Solomon for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Robert S. Erdahl and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mb. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.