green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tempo Instrument, Inc. v. Logitek, Inc.
See Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp., 190 F.2d 921 (2d Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 913 , 72 S.Ct. 360 , 96 L.Ed. 683 (1952) ; Conmar Products Corp. v. Universal Slide Fastener Co., 172 F.2d 150 (2d Cir. 1949) ; Pennington Eng’r Co. v. Honde Eng’r Corp., 136 F.2d 210 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 320 U.S. 771 , 64 S.Ct. 84 , 88 L.Ed. 461 (1943); Picard v. United Aircraft Corp., 128 F.2d 632 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 651 , 63 S.Ct. 46 , 87 L.Ed. 524 (1942); Kesses v. Eastman Kodak Co., 82 U.S.P.Q. 13 (S.D.N.Y. 1949) ; Kohloff v. Ford Motor Co., 37 F. Supp. 470 (S.D.N.Y.1940).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonavitacola v. United States
See United States v. Chiarelli, 7 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 528 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 913 , 72 S.Ct. 359 , 96 L.Ed. 683 , rehearing denied 342 U.S. 950 , 72 S.Ct. 551 , 96 L.Ed. 706 ; Ng Sing v. United States, 9 Cir., 1926, 8 F.2d 919 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Green
See also United States v. Chiarelli, 192 F.2d 528, 532 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 913 , reh. denied, 342 U.S. 950 (1952) (heroin is a derivative of opium); Jordan v. United States, 345 F.2d 302, 304 (10th Cir. 1965) (heroin derivative of opium and hence a narcotic); United States v. Gould, 536 F.2d 216, 218-219 (8th Cir. 1976) (cocaine hydrochloride is a derivative of coca leaves). 9 Contra White v. State, 161 Ind. App. 568, 572-575 (1974) (refusal to take judicial notice that methadone is a narcotic drug).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reinforced Molding Corp. v. General Electric Co.
See also, Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp. 190 F.2d 921, 924 (2d Cir.1951), cert. den., 342 U.S. 913 , 72 S.Ct. 360 , 96 L.Ed. 683 (1952). 17.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lemelson v. Kellogg Co.
“If a discovery is one which constitutes invention and for which a patent is issued, the right of further secrecy is, of course, lost, for a legal disclosure and public dedication have then been made, with a right of limited and temporary monopoly granted as the reward.” Sandlin v. Johnson, 141 F.2d 660, 661 (8th Cir. 1944); see also Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp., 190 F.2d 921, 924 (2d Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 913 , 72 S.Ct. 360 , 96 L.Ed. 683 (1952); Conmar Products Corp. v. Universal Slide Fastener Co., 172 F.2d 150, 155 (2d Cir. 1949).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hazel Bishop, Inc. v. Perfemme, Inc. And Hazel Bishop
See also Telechron, Inc. v. Parissi, 197 F.2d 757, 761 (2 Cir., 1952), saying that the Kleinman case had been “in substance overruled” by Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp., 190 F. 2d 921 (2 Cir., 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 913 , 72 S.Ct. 360 , 96 L.Ed. 683 (1952).
United States
v.
Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.
v.
Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.
No. 450.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 1952.
Solicitor General Perlman for the United States., Oscar-R. Houston and Leonard J. Matteson for respondents.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.