Palermo v. Luckenbach S.S. Co., 355 U.S. 20 (1957). · Go Syfert
Palermo v. Luckenbach S.S. Co., 355 U.S. 20 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
123 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Apodaca v. Weimer (casd, 2023-03-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Apodaca v. Weimer
S.D. Cal. · 2023 · confidence medium
This provides the defendant “fair notice of what 19 the plaintiff’s claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 20 41, 47 (1957).
examined Cited "see" Michael Massaro v. United States Lines Company v. Northern Metal Company (3×)
3rd Cir. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See Palermo v. Luckenbach Steamship Co., 355 U.S. 20 , 78 S.Ct. 1 , 2 L.Ed.2d 3 (1957); Pope & Talbot v. Hawn, 346 U.S. 406, 408-409 , 74 S.Ct. 202 , 98 *303 L.Ed. 143 (1953).
examined Cited "see" Ferrigno v. Ocean Transport, Ltd. (3×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See Palermo v. Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc., 1957, 355 U.S. 20 , 78 S.Ct. 1 , 2 L.Ed.2d 3 ; Dixon v. United States, 2 Cir., 1955, 219 F.2d 10 .
examined Cited "see" Walter Filipek v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc., and Third Party and Eastern Rigging Corp., Third Party (6×)
2d Cir. · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Palermo v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 246 F.2d 557, 561-563 , reversed 355 U.S. 20 , 78 S.Ct. 1 , 2 L.Ed.2d 3 , with the verdict eventually reinstated, 2 Cir., 253 F. 2d 724 ; Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 2 Cir., 245 F.2d 175, 183 , certiorari granted 355 U.S. 902 , 78 S.Ct. 335 , 2 L.Ed.2d 259 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." Raines v. John I. Hay Co. (3×)
N.D.N.Y. · 1960 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Court of Appeals opinion in Palermo v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 557 , reversed on other grounds 355 U.S. 20 , 78 S.Ct. 1 , 2 L.Ed.2d 3 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." Tomlinson Fleet Corporation v. Harold A. Herbst (6×)
6th Cir. · 1959 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Palermo v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 355 U.S. 20 , 78 S.Ct. 1 , 2 L.Ed.2d 3 ; The Law of Admiralty (Gilmore and Black, 1957), page 312. 18 The judgment of the district court is affirmed. 19 SHACKELFORD MILLER, JR., Circuit Judge (dissenting). 20 I am not in agreement with the ruling of the majority opinion which affirms the judgment on the basis of negligence on the part of the appellant. 21 The ruling of the majority opinion is based upon the fact that in answer to interrogatory No. 1, the jury found that the appellant was negligent, and upon the Court's conclusion that there was suffici…
Palermo
v.
Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc.
350.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 25, 1957.
355 U.S. 20
Philip F. Di Costanzo for petitioner., Eugene Underwood and William M. Kimball for respondent.
Harlan, Burton, Whittaker.
Cited by 46 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition for certiorari is granted, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded. * We hold that the trial court did not commit reversible error in refusing to charge respondent’s request[*21] No. 12. The petitioner’s alleged choice of a more dangerous route did not, under the proofs, operate to bar recovery as a matter of law. The jury was properly instructed that the petitioner’s negligence, if any, was to be considered in mitigation of damages under the rule applicable in actions for personal injuries arising from maritime torts. Poye & Talbot, Inc., v. Hawn, 346 U. S. 406, 408-409; cf. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Smith, 305 U. S. 424.

For reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524, Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.

[For memorandum of Mr. Justice Harlan, joined by Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Whittaker, see ante, p. 19.]
*

[Amended, post, p. 910, to provide for remand of the case to the Court of Appeals.]