Publishers' Ass'n v. New York Mailers' Union No. Six, 376 U.S. 775 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Publishers' Ass'n v. New York Mailers' Union No. Six, 376 U.S. 775 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
60 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Removatron International Corporation and Frederick E. Goodman v. Federal Trade Commission (ca1, 1989-09-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Removatron International Corporation and Frederick E. Goodman v. Federal Trade Commission
1st Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Giant Food, Inc. v. FTC, 322 F.2d 977, 986 (D.C.Cir.1963), cert. dismissed, 376 U.S. 967 , 84 S.Ct. 1121 , 12 L.Ed.2d 82 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Francis Schertenleib v. Jerome S. Traum
2d Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See discussion in the text at note 14, supra. We also note Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Co., 311 F.2d 429, 432-33 (5th Cir. 1962), vacated on other grounds, 376 U.S. 779 , 84 S.Ct. 1130 , 12 L.Ed.2d 82 (1964), reversing a district court’s dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds.
cited Cited "see" Diener's, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Giant Food, Inc. v. FTC, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 227 , 322 F.2d 977, 986 (1963), cert, dismissed, 376 U.S. 967 , 84 S.Ct. 1121 , 12 L.Ed.2d 82 (1964), and cases cited therein.
examined Cited "see" New York Telephone Company v. Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio (6×)
2d Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Publishers’ Ass’n v. New York Mailers’ Union No. 6, 317 F.2d 624 (2d Cir. 1963), vacated in part as moot, 376 U.S. 775 , 84 S.Ct. 1132 , 12 L.Ed.2d 82 (1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Texas-Capital Contractors, Inc. v. James Abdnor, Administrator, United States Small Business Administration
5th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although administrative agencies may be relieved from observance of strict common law rules of evidence, their hearings must still be conducted consistently with fundamental principles which inhere in due process of law. 190 F.2d 275, 277 (5th Cir.1951); see also, Giant Food, Inc. v. Federal Trade Comm’n, 322 F.2d 977, 984 (D.C.Cir.1963), cert. dism’d, 376 U.S. 967 , 84 S.Ct. 1121 , 12 L.Ed.2d 82 (1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Joseph A. Kaplan & Sons, Inc., a Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1965 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Giant Food Inc. v. FTC, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 227 , 237, 322 F.2d 977, 987 (1963), cert. dismissed, 376 U.S. 967 , 84 S.Ct. 1121 , 12 L.Ed.2d 82 (1964); Vanity Fair Paper Mills, Inc. v. FTC, 311 F.2d 480, 488 (2d Cir. 1962).
Publishers’ Association of New York City
v.
New York Mailers’ Union Number Six
384.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 6, 1964.
376 U.S. 775
Andrew L. Hughes argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner., Sidney Sugerman argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Gerhard P. Van Arkel and George Kaufmann.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

Upon the respondent’s suggestion of mootness the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals is vacated insofar as it reversed the stay provision of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss as moot that portion of the complaint seeking such a stay.