Del Valle v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Int'l Union, 379 U.S. 879 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Del Valle v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Int'l Union, 379 U.S. 879 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
74 citation events across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wilcox Associates v. Fairbanks North Star Borough (alaska, 1979-12-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Wilcox Associates v. Fairbanks North Star Borough
Alaska · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Morrell, 331 F.2d 498 (10th Cir. 1964), cert. denied sub nom., Chournos v. United States, 379 U.S. 879 , 85 S.Ct. 146 , 13 L.Ed.2d 86 (1964); Lawrence v. United States, 381 F.2d 989 (9th Cir. 1967); Coastwise Packet Co. v. United States, 398 F.2d 77 (1st Cir. 1968), *906 cert. denied, 393 U.S. 937 , 89 S.Ct. 300 , 21 L.Ed.2d 274 (1968); Lemmons v. United States, 496 F.2d 864 , 204 Ct.Cl. 404 (1974); but see Pennsylvania R.
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Boston and Maine Corp.
D. Mass. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Chicago Express, Inc., 222 F.Supp. 566, 571 (S.D.N.Y.1963), aff'd 332 F.2d 276 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 879 , 85 S.Ct. 146 , 13 L.Ed.2d 86 (1964), where the court said: “Where Congress intended that special *1000 priorities be granted ‘it has carefully enumerated them, and any omissions must be construed as express exclusions . . . ’ (Citations omitted.) 3 .
discussed Cited "see" In the Matter of I. C. Herman & Co., Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. Taub, Hummel & Schnall, Inc., Claimant-Appellant (2×)
2d Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See In Re Chicago Express, Inc., 332 F.2d 276, 278-79 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 879 (1964). 13 Finally, we reject as a non sequitur Taub's argument that a holding in the instant case affirming its classification as a general unsecured creditor, read in conjunction with the Saunders holding that subrogated priority is not available when the broker is the nominal consignee and importer of record, means that there is no conceivable situation in which a broker can achieve priority status by paying the customs duties owed by an importer.
cited Cited "see" United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph Coffey, Relator-Appellee v. Hon. Edward M. Fay, as Warden, Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New York
2d Cir. · 1965 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Elgisser, 334 F.2d 103, 110 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 879 , 881, 85 S.Ct. 148 , 151, 13 L.Ed.2d 86, 87 (1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Amalgamated Workers Union of the Virgin Islands v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp
3rd Cir. · 1973 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hotel & Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union v. Del Valle, 328 F.2d 885, 886 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 879 (1964); Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 314 F.2d 886, 923-24 (4th Cir. 1963).
Del Valle
v.
Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union, AFL-CIO
No. 305.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1964.
379 U.S. 879
Ginoris Vizcarra for petitioners. J. W. Brown, Benjamin Gettler and Jonas B. Katz for respondents.
Published

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied'.