Bowling v. United States, 383 U.S. 908 (1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Bowling v. United States, 383 U.S. 908 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Huslage (pawd, 1979-12-05) · Strongest negative: United States v. Townsend (mied, 1975-04-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Townsend
E.D. Mich. · 1975 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. U. S. v. Bowling, 351 F.2d 236 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. den. 383 U.S. 908 , 86 S.Ct. 888 , 15 L.Ed.2d 663 , reh. den. 383 U.S. 973 , 86 S.Ct. 1269 , 16 L.Ed.2d 313 , which suggests attention to the federal rules even in those circumstances.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Huslage
W.D. Pa. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bowling, 351 F.2d 236, 241 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 908 , 86 S.Ct. 888 , 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966) (entries onto premises on successive days pursuant to single warrant upheld); State v. Swain, 269 N.W.2d 707, 718-19 (Minn.1978) (seizures from search that continued over three-day period pursuant to single warrant upheld where probable cause continued to exist and police reasonably needed the time to conduct an effective search, which involved use of chemical tests).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bernard Jerome Lee, A/K/A James Wesley Carter (2×)
4th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bowling, 351 F.2d 236 , 241-42 & n. 2 (6 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 908 , 86 S.Ct. 888 , 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ted Dudek, A/K/A Ted Landers
6th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bowling, 351 F.2d 236 (6 Cir. *689 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 908 , 86 S.Ct. 888 , 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966); Gillespie v. United States, 368 F.2d 1, 4 (8 Cir. 1968); United States v. Scolnick, 392 F.2d 320, 323 (3 Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Martin F. Burke
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bowling, 351 F.2d 236 (6 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 908 , 86 S.Ct. 888 , 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966); Gillespie v. United States, 368 F.2d 1, 4 (8 Cir. 1968); 3 United States v. Scolnick, 392 F.2d 320, 323 (3 Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" Aguilar v. Texas
S.D. Tex. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bowling, 351 F.2d 236 (6th Cir. 1965) certiorari denied 383 U.S. 908 [ 86 S.Ct. 888 , 15 L.Ed.2d 663 ], and cases cited at note 2, 351 F.2d at 242 ; Kenney v. United States, [ 81 U.S.App.D.C. 259 ] 157 F.2d 442 (D.C.Cir.1946); United States v. Brunett, 153 F.2d 219 (W.D.Mo.1931); United States v. Roth, 391 F.2d 507 (7th Cir. 1967); King v. United States, 282 F.2d 398 (4th Cir. 1960); United States v. Halsey, 257 F.Supp. 1002 (S.D.N.Y.1966).” Cited in Hernandez v. Beto, C.A. 69-H-1231, Sept. 18, 1970, an unreported opinion of Judge James Noel for the Southern District of …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Kenneth Votteller
6th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
With respect to the degree of specificity required of a search warrant’s description of premises to be searched, the Supreme Court has stated: “It is enough if the description is such that the officer with a search warrant can, with reasonable effort ascertain and identify the place intended.” Steele v. United States No. 1, 267 U.S. 498, 503 , 45 S.Ct. 414, 416 , 69 L.Ed. 757 (1925); See also United States v. Bowling, 351 F.2d 236 (6th Cir. 1965) cert. den. 383 U.S. 908 , 86 S.Ct. 888 , 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966); United States v. Hassell, 427 F.2d 348 (6th Cir. 1970). *1363 As we pointed out…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. R. C. Frazier
6th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Bowling, 351 F.2d 236 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 908 , 86 S.Ct. 888 , 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Howard Dee Hassell
6th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Bowling, 351 F.2d 236 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 908 , 86 S.Ct. 888 , 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ronald Raymond Ravich and Edward McConnell
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Bowling, 351 F.2d 236 (6 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 908 , 86 S.Ct. 888 , 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966), and Gillespie v. United States, 368 F.2d 1 (8 Cir. 1966) (dictum) (both holding state law is sole test where warrants were issued by state judicial officer), with Navarro v. United States, 400 F.2d 315 (5 Cir. 1968) (federal law).
Bowling
v.
United States
No. 837.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1966.
383 U.S. 908
Thomas D. Hirschfeld for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Donald I. Bier-man for the United States.
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.