Gen. Motors Corp. v. Int'l Union, 389 U.S. 857 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Gen. Motors Corp. v. Int'l Union, 389 U.S. 857 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
89 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (cadc, 1988-12-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See International Union, UAW v. NLRB, 381 F.2d 265, 266 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 857 , 88 S.Ct. 82 , 19 L.Ed.2d 122 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" Ramseyer v. General Motors Corp.
8th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Lowe v. Taylor Steel Products Co., 373 F.2d 65, 68 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 858 , 88 S.Ct. 85 , 19 L.Ed.2d 122 (1967); Cities Service Oil Co. v. Harvey, 148 F.2d 780, 783 (10th Cir. 1945).
discussed Cited "see" Ramseyer v. General Motors Corporation
8th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Lowe v. Taylor Steel Products Co., 373 F.2d 65, 68 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 858 , 88 S.Ct. 85 , 19 L.Ed.2d 122 (1967); Cities Service Oil Co. v. Harvey, 148 F.2d 780, 783 (10th Cir. 1945). 13 On this issue, the appellant also argues that the jury, realizing that the hitchhiker's negligence barred plaintiff's recovery, gave little consideration to the key issue of warranty.
discussed Cited "see" Carcich v. Rederi A/B Nordie
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger, supra. We recently have examined at length the law in this area, see Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc. v. Leonard, 384 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1967), and Penoro v. Rederi A/B Disa, 376 F.2d 125 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Rederi A/B Disa v. Cunard Steamship Co., 389 U.S. 852 , 88 S.Ct. 78 , 19 L.Ed.2d 122 (1967), and thus find it unnecessary to repeat what we have already said on this subject.
discussed Cited "see" ca2 1968
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger,supra. We recently have examined at length the law in this area, see Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc. v. Leonard, 384 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1967), and Penoro v. Rederi A/B Disa, 376 F.2d 125 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Rederi A/B Disa v. Cunard Steamship Co., 389 U.S. 852 , 88 S.Ct. 78 , 19 L.Ed.2d 122 (1967), and thus find it unnecessary to repeat what we have already said on this subject.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." E. F. Hutton & Company, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Melford Berns, and Lenny Garcia, Appellants/cross-Appellees (2×)
8th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g, Lowe v. Taylor Steel Products Co., 373 F.2d 65, 68 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 858 , 88 S.Ct. 85 , 19 L.Ed.2d 122 (1967); Warren v. Ward, 371 F.2d 906, 908 (8th Cir. 1967); Coughlin v. Capitol Cement Co., 571 F.2d 290, 305 (5th Cir. 1978); Eastburn v. Ford Motor Co., 471 F.2d 21, 22 (5th Cir. 1972).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sands v. Wainwright
M.D. Fla. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Washington v. Lee, 263 F.Supp. 327 at 331 (M.D.Ala.1966), aff’d per curiam 390 U.S. 333 , 88 S.Ct. 994 , 19 L.Ed.2d 122 (1968).
General Motors Corp.
v.
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW)
No. 316.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
389 U.S. 857
Aloysim F. Power, Harry S. Benjamin, Jr., Eugene L. Hartwig, George Cherpelis and K. Douglas Marni for petitioner., Stephen I. Schlossberg, John A. Fillion, Bernard F. Ashe, Jordan Bossen, Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., and John Silard for International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), and Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordma/n, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for the National Labor Relations Board, respondents.
Are, Certio, Consideration, Granted, Harlan, Should, Took.
Cited by 47 opinions  |  Published

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certio-rari should be granted. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.