Austin v. Meyer, 413 U.S. 905 (1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Austin v. Meyer, 413 U.S. 905 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Turoso v. Cleveland Municipal Court (ca6, 1982-02-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Turoso v. Cleveland Municipal Court
6th Cir. · 1982 · confidence medium
In Miller, the court said: “Under the holdings announced today, no one will be subject to prosecution for ... obscene materials unless these materials depict or describe patently offensive ‘hardcore’ sexual conduct specifically defined....” 413 U.S. at 27, 93 S.Ct. at 2616 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. Carson
M.D. Fla. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Star v. Preller, 352 F.Supp. 530 (D.Md.1972) (three-judge court), vacated, 413 U.S. 905 , 93 S.Ct. 3054 , 37 L.Ed.2d *705 1016 (1973).
Austin
v.
Meyer Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County v. P. B. I. C., Inc. Davis v. Parker
No. 70-35; No. 71-304; No. 71-1318.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 1973.
413 U.S. 905
Ante, Brennan, California, Cases, Inconsistent, Judgments, Marshall, Proceedings, Remand, Slaton, Stewart, Theatre, Vacate, Would.
Cited by 26 opinions  |  Published

[*905] Appeal from D. C. M. D. Fla. Reported below: 319 F. Supp. 457;

[*906] No. 71-1318.

Appeal from D. C. Mass. Reported below: 313 F. Supp. 757; and

Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. Judgments vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.

Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgments. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgments and remand the cases for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47.