green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.8 score
“if the matter were open to us we would be responsive to the appellants' argument that feres should be reconsidered”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re\ Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation"
if the matter were open to us we would be responsive to the appellants' argument that feres should be reconsidered
discussed
Cited "see"
Al Friedman v. Board Of County Commissioners Of Bernalillo County
See Anderson v. Salt Lake City Corp., 475 F.2d 29, 31 (10th Cir.) (Challenge to monument with religious and nonreligious symbols on courthouse grounds involved a "basic First Amendment right, of which the federal court has jurisdiction, and, although a like provision of the state constitution is involved, proper resolution of the federal right is not conditioned upon resolution of any state question, law or constitution."), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 50 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973). 5 See Zellers v. Huff, 55 N.M. 501 , 236 P.2d 949, 959-61 (1951) (holding invalid under federal and state …
discussed
Cited "see"
A1 Friedman v. Board of County Commissioners
See Anderson v. Salt Lake City Corp., 475 F.2d 29, 31 (10th Cir.) (Challenge to monument with religious and nonreligious symbols on courthouse grounds involved a "basic First Amendment right, of which the federal court has jurisdiction, and, although a like provision of the state constitution is involved, proper resolution of the federal right is not conditioned upon resolution of any state question, law or constitution.”), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 50 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ring v. Grand Forks Public School District No. 1
See Lemon, supra. Defendants cite Anderson v. Salt Lake City Corporation, 475 F.2d 29 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 50 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973), as authority for their argument that the placard serves a secular purpose.
cited
Cited "see"
Rasmussen v. City of Lake Forest, Illinois
See Anderson v. Salt Lake City Corporation, 475 F.2d 29 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 50 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Wallace v. State
See, Andersen v. State, 274 So.2d 228 (Fla.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 150 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973); Byrd v. State, 80 So.2d 694 (Fla.1955); Collins v. State, 65 So.2d 61 (Fla.1953).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Civil Liberties Union v. Mercer County
See, e.g., Anderson v. Salt Lake City, 475 F.2d 29 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 414 U.S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 50 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973); Books v. City of Elkhart, Indiana, No. 3:98cv0230 AS (N.D.Ind.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pablo Sanchez v. United States
See e.g., Peluso v. United States, 474 F.2d 605, 606 (3d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 50 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973); In re "Agent Orange” Prod.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McVan v. Bolco Athletic Co.
See also Peluso v. United States, 474 F.2d 605 (3d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 50 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terrell v. State
See, e.g., Andersen v. State, 274 So.2d 228 (Fla.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 150 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973); M.J. v. State, 399 So.2d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); United States v. Colon, 559 F.2d 1380 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Chavez, 482 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir.1973); United States v. Long, 439 F.2d 628 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation"
See, e. g., Peluso v. United States, 474 F.2d 605, 606 (CA3), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 50 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973) (“If the matter were open to us we would be receptive to appellants’ argument that Feres should be reconsidered, and perhaps restricted”); Thomason v. Sanchez, 398 F.Supp. 500, 503 (D.N.J. 1975) (“we previously expressed reservations about the continued validity of the broad Feres doctrine.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Watkins v. United States
See also Peluso v. United States,.474 F.2d 605, 606 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 879 , 94 S.Ct. 50 , 38 L.Ed.2d 124 (1973).
Taylor et vir
v.
Jones
v.
Jones
No. 72-1540.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
Sup. Ct. Ala. Motions to dispense with printing petition and respondent’s briefs granted. Certiorari denied.