green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
6.8 score
“nor do we feel . . . investigation of receiving prisons is required by the new england corrections compact or 18 u.s.c. 5003 . in addition, we agree that neither the compact nor federal law preclude transfers for nonrehabilitative purposes.”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Tran v. Keeney
But see United States v. Kaylor, 491 F.2d 1127, 1131 (2d Cir.1973) (no indication of impermissible suggestiveness even though two photographs of suspect included in array shown to witnesses), modified on other grounds, 491 F.2d 1133 (2d Cir.) (en banc), vacated on other grounds, 418 U.S. 909 (1974). 8 We review the constitutionality of pretrial identification procedures de novo.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
ca7 1981
(t)o be cast outside the jurisdiction within which one was sentenced is often to be separated from rights, privileges, and standards otherwise available to become to some degree, a 'man without a country'.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anthony v. Wilkinson
o be cast outside the jurisdiction within which one was sentenced is often to be separated from rights, privileges, and standards otherwise available - to become to some degree, a 'man without a country'.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anthony F. Sisbarro v. Warden, Massachusetts State Penitentiary
nor do we feel . . . investigation of receiving prisons is required by the new england corrections compact or 18 u.s.c. 5003 . in addition, we agree that neither the compact nor federal law preclude transfers for nonrehabilitative purposes.
cited
Cited "see"
Chapman v. Meachum
See United States v. Kaylor, 491 F.2d 1127, 1132 (2d Cir.1973), rev’d on other grounds sub nom., United States v. Hopkins, 418 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 3201 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1155 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lyman T. Shepard v. Larry Taylor, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center, and Maurice Sigler, Chairman, United States Parole Commission
See United States v. Kaylor, 491 F.2d 1133 (2d Cir.) (en banc), vacated for reconsideration on other grounds, 418 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 3201 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1155 (1974); United States v. Waters, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 289 , 437 F.2d 722 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Rebideau v. Stoneman
See Gomes v. Travisono, 490 F.2d 1209 (1st Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded, 418 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 3202 , 41 L.Ed.2d 153 (1974), on remand, 510 F.2d 537 (1st Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Morris v. Anthony Travisono
See Gomes v. Travisono, 490 F.2d 1209 , 1215 & nn. 9-10 (1st Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded, 418 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 3200 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1155 (1974), aff’d in pertinent part, 510 F.2d 537 (1st Cir. 1974); Hoitt v. Vitek, 497 F.2d 598 (1st Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
David L. Stone, and Emory Hyatt, Jr. v. Charles Egeler, Deputy Warden, State Prison, Jackson
See Travisono v. Gomes, 418 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 3200 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1155 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hickman
See, e.g., Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 308, 313 [ 124 S Ct 2531 , 159 L Ed 2d 403 ] (2004); Jones v. United States, 526 US 227, 244 [ 119 S Ct 1215 , 143 L Ed 2d 311 ] (1999).” Kenneth S. Klein, Why Federal Rule of Evidence 403 is Unconstitutional and Why That Matters, 47 U Rich L Rev 1077, 1081 (2012-13) (emphasis in original). 11 As discussed, “a ‘show-up’ is a procedure in which police officers present an eyewitness with a single suspect for identification!.]” Lawson, 352 Or at 742 ; see also United States v. Kaylor, 491 F2d 1127, 1132 (2d Cir 1973), vac’d on other ground…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roger Lee Brager v. United States
See also United States v. Hopkins, 418 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 3201 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1155 (1974), vacating and remanding United States v. Kaylor, 491 F.2d 1127 and 1133 (2nd Cir. 1974); United States v. Flebotte, 503 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir. 1974).
Travisono, Corrections Director
v.
Gomes
v.
Gomes
No. 73-1335.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 8, 1974.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2) · First Circuit (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Wolff v. McDonnell, ante, p. 539.