green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“the Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury does not survive a default judgment”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Frankart Distributors, Inc. v. Levitz
the seventh amendment right to trial by jury does not survive a default judgment
cited
Cited "see"
Nike Incorporated v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc., Brooks Shoe, Inc., and Brooks Sports, Inc.
See Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.) (upholding default judgment based upon an oral order to produce documents), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America Government of the Virgin Islands v. Clement Xavier
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 739 (3d Cir.) (prejudice assessed based on the nature of improper remarks and circumstances in which they were made), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
R.W. International Corp. And T. H. Ward De La Cruz, Inc. v. Welch Foods, Inc. And Magna Trading Corp.
See Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.) (where oral proceedings clearly require litigant to produce certain documents, absence of written order does not pre-elude imposing default judgment for failure to comply), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1991
See United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 778-79 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983). 17 "[J]oinder ... of a conspiracy count and substantive counts arising out of the conspiracy [is permitted], since the claim of conspiracy provides a common link, and demonstrates the existence of a common scheme or plan." United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 729-730 (3d Cir.) (emphasis in Somers, quoting Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Sec. 144), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 57, 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974). 78 We agree with the Sec…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eufrasio
See United States v. Dickens, 695 F.2d 765, 778-79 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1092 , 103 S.Ct. 1792 , 76 L.Ed.2d 359 (1983). 17 “[Jjoinder ... of a conspiracy count and substantive counts arising out of the conspiracy [is permitted], since the claim of conspiracy provides a common link, and demonstrates the existence of a common scheme or plan.” United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 729-730 (3d Cir.) (emphasis in Somers , quoting Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 144), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 57, 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernstein v. Fernandez
(2×)
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 737-739 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Anthony Rivera
(2×)
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 743-44 (3d Cir.) (reviewing history of law regarding variances from the indictment and amendments to the indictment), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Frederick Forte
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 742 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Joseph, Emmanuel
United, States v. Kravitz, 281 F.2d 581, 587 (3d Cir.1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 459 , 5 L.Ed.2d 372 (1961); accord United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 736 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974); United States v. LeFevre, 483 F.2d 477, 478 (3d Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Professional Seminar Consultants, Inc., a Corporation v. Sino American Technology Exchange Council, Inc., and G.Y. Lin
(2×)
See Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974). 31 A court may impose sanctions for failure to comply with its order, whether or not the opposing party first gave notice by moving to compel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gigli
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
ca3 1983
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickens
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mattie Doll Simmons, United States of America v. Maurice Brown
(2×)
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 730 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1981
Accord, Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir. 1974), certiorari denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 ("Where oral proceedings unequivocally give a litigant notice that certain documents are to be produced, the absence of a written order does not preclude the entry of a default judgment for failure to comply.").
discussed
Cited "see"
Charter House Insurance Brokers, Ltd. v. New Hampshire Insurance
Accord, Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir. 1974), certiorari denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (“Where oral proceedings unequivocally give a litigant notice that certain documents are to be produced, the absence of a written order does not preclude the entry of a default judgment for failure to comply.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert L. Herring, and Jerry D. Dorminey
See United States v. Bryant, 490 F.2d 1372, 1377 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 57 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William Richman
See authorities cited in note 35, supra. See generally United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 737 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974): 37 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sinclair
See United States v. Somer, 496 F.2d 723 , 737 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenny Derosa A/K/A Pup, in No. 76-1642 Appeal of Brando Rosetta, in No. 76-1643
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 , 736-39 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974); United States v. Leftwich, 461 F.2d 586, 590 (3d Cir. 1972) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 915 , 93 S.Ct. 247 , 34 L.Ed.2d 178 (1972); United States v. Turner, 409 F.2d 102, 103-04 (3d Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Max H. Homer A/K/A Max H. Homer, Jr.
Accord, United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723, 737 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974): “[W]e will reverse upon demonstrations of prosecutorial misconduct only in those situations in which prejudice inures to the defendant from the challenged improprieties.” Our awareness of the nature of opening and closing arguments in an adversary proceeding and our concern for judicial administration preclude us from setting aside a verdict and ordering a new trial every time an advocate is verbally indiscreet unless his remarks are obviously prejudicial.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Telesforo Ray Gomez, and Cayetano Morin-Degollado
(2×)
See United States v. Bryant, 490 F.2d 1372, 1378 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 57 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frumento
See United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 , 731 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974); Byrd v. Wainwright, 428 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Crisona, 271 F.Supp. 150, 154 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Ford v. State of New Jersey
Accord, United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir. 1974), cert. denied 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Welding & Gas, Inc. v. Weldworld Corporation
See e.g., Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 317 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fujimoto v. Au
See also Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (Rule 37(b) sanction upheld where district court orally had ordered defendant to produce records, since “[w]here oral proceedings unequivocally give a litigant notice that certain documents are to be produced, the absence of a written order does not preclude the entry of a default judgment for failure to comply.”); Jones v. Uris Sales Corp., 373 F.2d 644, 646-47 (2d Cir.1967) (proceedings in judge’s chambers, where judge announced that he would give counsel twenty-fou…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Payne v. Dewitt
(2×)
See also Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974)(after a default judgment has been entered under FRCP 37(b)(2), a party has no right to jury trial under either FRCP 55(b)(2), which authorizes a district court to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the amount of damages, or to the Seventh-Amendment protection); see also Paul Mogin, Why Judges, Not Juries, Should Set Punitive Damages, 65 U. of Ch.L.Rev. 179 (1998). [19] State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Unigard Security Insurance v. Lakewood Engineering & Manufacturing Corp.
See, e.g., Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (Rule 37 sanctions may be imposed on a party for disobedience to a court’s request in oral proceedings, so long as those proceedings give the party unequivocal notice that a court has asked that certain documents be produced.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Unigard Security Insurance Company v. Lakewood Engineering & Manufacturing Corporation
See, e.g., Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (Rule 37 sanctions may be imposed on a party for disobedience to a court's request in oral proceedings, so long as those proceedings give the party unequivocal notice that a court has asked that certain documents be produced.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Halaco Engineering Co. v. Costle
See e.g., Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (noting that an order triggering Rule 37(b)(2) may be oral). 17 No order was issued by the court below under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(C).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Halaco Engineering Co. v. Costle
See e.g., Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (noting that an order triggering Rule 37(b)(2) may be oral).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L.
See also Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (Rule 37(b) sanction upheld where district court orally had ordered defendant to produce records, since “[wjhere oral proceedings unequivocally give a litigant notice that certain documents are to be produced, the absence of a written order does not preclude the entry of a default judgment for failure to comply.”); Jones v. Uris Sales Corp., 373 F.2d 644, 646-47 (2d Cir.1967) (proceedings in judge’s chambers, where judge announced that he would give counsel twenty-fou…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tamari v. Bache & Co. Lebanon)
See also Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 318 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974) (Rule 37(b) sanction upheld where district court orally had ordered defendant to produce records, since "[w]here oral proceedings unequivocally give a litigant notice that certain documents are to be produced, the absence of a written order does not preclude the entry of a default judgment for failure to comply."); Jones v. Uris Sales Corp., 373 F.2d 644, 646-47 (2d Cir.1967) (proceedings in judge's chambers, where judge announced that he would give counsel twenty-four hour…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hooks v. State
See, e. g., United States v. Somers, 3d Cir., 496 F.2d 723 (1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974); United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co., 2d Cir., 155 F.2d 631 (1946); United States v. De Vasto, 2d Cir., 52 F.2d 26 (1931), cert. den. 284 U.S. 678 , 52 S.Ct. 138 , 76 L.Ed. 573 (1931); United States v. Brisco, D.Del., 473 F.Supp. 303 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peifer
See also United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 , 740 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974), United States v. Benson, 487 F.2d 978, 981 (3d Cir. 1973), United States v. Schartner, 426 F.2d 470, 477 (3d Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Russell Greenfield, M.D.
There is no necessity for synonymity but there must be substantial relevancy for purposes other than to show the probability that the person committed the offense being tried because he is a man of criminal character.” United States v. Kasouris, 474 F.2d 689, 692 (5th Cir. 1973); see also United States v. Bryant, 490 F.2d 1372, 1377 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 , 95 S.Ct. 57 , 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Montgomery Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
See, e.g., Irving Berlin Music Corp. v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 1, 17-18 , 487 F. 2d 540, 549-50 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832 (1974).
Sneiders
v.
Henry
v.
Henry
No. 73-1709.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.