green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
James Sams v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Afl/cio, Clc, Jimmie Orr v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl/cio, Clc
See City of Naples v. Prepakt Concrete Co., 494 F.2d 511 , 512 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 , 95 S.Ct. 76 , 42 L.Ed.2d 71 (1974) (citing 9 Moore’s Fed.Prac. ¶ 110.07 at 109).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weststar Associates, Inc. v. Tin Metals Company
See City of Naples v. Prepakt Concrete Co., 490 F.2d 182, 184 (5th Cir.), reh. denied, 494 F.2d 511 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 , 95 S.Ct. 76 , 42 L.Ed.2d 71 (1974); Reed & Martin, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 439 F.2d 1268, 1276-77 (2d Cir.1971).
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1980
See Monogram Models, Inc. v. Industo Motive Corp., 492 F.2d 1281, 1288 (6th Cir.), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 , 95 S.Ct. 76 , 42 L.Ed.2d 71 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Russell v. Price
See Monogram Models, Inc. v. Industo Motive Corp., 492 F.2d 1281, 1288 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 , 95 S.Ct. 76 , 42 L.Ed.2d 71 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cass County Music Company Red Cloud Music Company v. C.H.L.R., Inc. Jeffrey C. Jones Stanford P. Glazer John L. Marks, Originally Sued as John L. Marx
But, to the Seventh Circuit, it is “clear that it is for the district court and not for a jury to determine the appropriate award of statutory damages, within the limits prescribed.” Id. at 1014; see also Monogram Models, Inc. v. Industro Motive Corp., 492 F.2d 1281, 1283 (6th Cir.) (“[t]he issue of infringement was submitted to a jury” but the judge determined the amount of statutory damages in Sixth Circuit case where jury-trial issue was not before the court on appeal), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 , 95 S.Ct. 76 , 42 L.Ed.2d 71 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cass Cty. Music Co. v. C.H.L.R.
But, to the Seventh Circuit, it is "clear that it is for the district court and not for a jury to determine the appropriate award of statutory damages, within the limits prescribed." Id. at 1014; see also Mongram Models, Inc. v. Industro Motive Corp., 492 F.2d 1281, 1283 (6th Cir.) ("[t]he issue of infringement was submitted to a jury" but the judge determined the amount of statutory damages in Sixth Circuit case where jury-trial issue was not before the court on appeal), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Soo Line Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
Compare Sunshine Beauty Supplies, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, 872 F.2d 310, 312 (9th Cir.1989) (“this circuit has held that 9 U.S.C. § 10 ... limits jurisdiction to vacate an award to the district where the award was made”) (citations omitted) and City of Naples v. Prepakt Concrete Co., 490 F.2d 182, 183 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 , 95 S.Ct. 76 , 42 L.Ed.2d 71 (1974) (suit to vacate or affirm arbitration award must be brought in the district court for the district in which the award was made) with Concourse Beauty School, Inc. v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Administrative Management Services, Ltd., Inc. v. Royal American Managers, Inc., the Omaha Indemnity Company, a Corporation
See also Naples, 494 F.2d 511, 512-13 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 , 95 S.Ct. 76 , 42 L.Ed.2d 71 (1974) (where the former Fifth Circuit cites La Nacional to state that "an order denying a § 4 petition to compel arbitration, entered in a suit at law claiming damages for breach of contract, was a final judgment and appealable”). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Central Valley Typographical Union, No. 46 v. McClatchy Newspapers
See also City of Naples v. Prepakt Concrete Co., 490 F.2d 182, 184 (5th Cir.) (jurisdiction under the Arbitration Act is determined by where the hearing is held), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 , 95 S.Ct. 76 , 42 L.Ed.2d 71 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1985
See also City of Naples v. Prepakt Concrete Co., 490 F.2d 182, 184 (5th Cir.) (jurisdiction under the Arbitration Act is determined by where the hearing is held), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 , 95 S.Ct. 76 , 42 L.Ed.2d 71 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gavlik Construction Co. v. H. F. Campbell Co.
See also City of Naples v. Prepakt Concrete Co., 490 F.2d 182 , reh. denied, 494 F.2d 511, 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 843 , 95 S.Ct. 76 , 42 L.Ed.2d 71 (1974). .
Pordum
v.
Board of Regents of New York
v.
Board of Regents of New York
No. 73-1963.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.