Turk v. United States, 429 U.S. 823 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Turk v. United States, 429 U.S. 823 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases · "The general rule is that an interlocutory order from which no appeal lies is merged into the final judgment and open to review on appeal from that judgment."
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “A trial court has broad discretion in its choice of sanctions for failure to comply with discovery orders and, in appropriate circumstances, it may even dismiss the case.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “Dunkin’ Donuts”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “Had Mrs. Burns wished to expatriate herself she could simply have unequivocally stated that she renounced her American citizenship.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “The exemption applies, then, even if the purpose of the conversation is criminal, as long as the purpose of the recording is not.”
351 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 72 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kahane v. Secretary of State (dcd, 1988-12-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Kahane v. Secretary of State
D.D.C. · 1988 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
had mrs. burns wished to expatriate herself she could simply have unequivocally stated that she renounced her american citizenship.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Vest
D. Mass. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the exemption applies, then, even if the purpose of the conversation is criminal, as long as the purpose of the recording is not.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Tringali v. Hathaway Machinery Co.
1st Cir. · 1986 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the general rule is that an interlocutory order from which no appeal lies is merged into the final judgment and open to review on appeal from that judgment.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) 15 Collier bankr.cas.2d 273, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,218 Domenico Tringali v. Hathaway MacHinery Company, Inc., (Two Cases)
1st Cir. · 1986 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the general rule is that an interlocutory order from which no appeal lies is merged into the final judgment and open to review on appeal from that judgment.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) J. M. Cleminshaw Co. v. City of Norwich
D. Conn. · 1981 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a trial court has broad discretion in its choice of sanctions for failure to comply with discovery orders and, in appropriate circumstances, it may even dismiss the case.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Robert's Waikiki U-Drive, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.
D. Haw. · 1980 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
because the combination rate offer is voluntary, we agree with the district court that it is not illegal per se as a tying arrangement
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) SmithKline Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
E.D. Pa. · 1976 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
dunkin' donuts
cited Cited "see" White v. White
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Turk, 526 F. 2d 654, 658-59 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct . 74, 50 L.Ed. 2d 84 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
E.D. Pa. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976) (holding that there was no interception when the police listened to a tape of a telephone conversation previously recorded by one of the parties to the conversation).
cited Cited "see" Peavy v. Harman
N.D. Tex. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 658 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976). 16 .
discussed Cited "see" David S. Reynolds v. Juanita Spears
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 659 (5th Cir.) (“we conclude that no new and distinct interception occurs when the contents of a communication are revealed through the replaying of a previous recording”), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); cf. United States v. *433 Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519, 1527 (11th Cir.) (“the term ‘intercept’ as it relates to ‘aural acquisitions’ refers to the place where a communication is initially obtained regardless of where the communication is ultimately heard”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed…
discussed Cited "see" Reynolds v. Spears
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 659 (5th Cir.) ("we conclude that no new and distinct interception occurs when the contents of a communication are revealed through the replaying of a previous recording"), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); cf. United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519, 1527 (11th Cir.) ("the term 'intercept' as it relates to 'aural acquisitions' refers to the place where a communication is initially obtained regardless of where the communication is ultimately heard"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 658 (5th Cir.) (act requires "contemporaneous acquisition of the communication through the use of the device"), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Daccarett
unknown court · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 658 (5th Cir.) (act requires “contemporaneous acquisition of the communication through the use of the device”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Charles M. Thibeault v. Square D Company
1st Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Marathon Oil Co., 528 F.2d 395, 403 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 75 , 50 L.Ed.2d 85 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Brokers' Assistant, Inc. v. Williams Real Estate Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Matheson, 532 F.2d 809, 813 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 75 , 50 L.Ed.2d 85 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Margrave v. British Airways
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Matheson, 532 F.2d 809, 813 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 75 , 50 L.Ed.2d 85 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Skepton v. County of Bucks, Pa.
E.D. Pa. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited Cited "see" In re Asbestos School Litigation
E.D. Pa. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Unger v. Dunkin’ Donuts of Am., Inc., 68 F.R.D. 65, 79, 139 (E.D.Pa.1975) rev’d, 531 F.2d 1211 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Redd Horne, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211 , 1218 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Innovation Data Processing, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
D.N.J. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Northern Pacific Railway v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 , 78 S.Ct. 514 , 2 L.Ed.2d 545 (1958), and Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts, 531 F.2d 1211 , 1223-24 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1977).
discussed Cited "see" Estate of Vriniotis v. Commissioner (2×)
Tax Ct. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Matheson, 532 F.2d 809, 816-817 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 (1976); Jalbuena v. Dulles, 254 F.2d 379, 381 (3d Cir. 1958); Rueff v. Brownell, 116 F. Supp. 298, 306 (D.
cited Cited "see" Unijax, Inc. v. Champion International, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Marathon Oil Co., 528 F.2d 395 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 75 , 50 L.Ed.2d 85 (1976).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211, 1224 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" ca2 1981 (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420, 428-29 (2d Cir.), rehearing en banc denied, 531 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Association Against Discrimination in Employment, Inc. v. City of Bridgeport (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420, 428-29 (2d Cir.), rehearing en banc denied, 531 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" ca3 1981
3rd Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts, 3 Cir. 1976, 531 F.2d 1211 , 1224-25, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Halverson v. Convenient Food Mart, Inc., 1974, N.D.Ill., 69 F.R.D. 331, 335-36 ; Abercrombie v. Lum's, Inc., 1972, S.D.Fla., 345 F.Supp. 387, 391 ; Lah v. Shell Oil Co., 1970, S.D.Ohio, 50 F.R.D. 198 10 Bob Maxfield's full name is James R.
discussed Cited "see" Bob Maxfield, Inc. v. American Motors Corp.
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts, 3 Cir. 1976, 531 F.2d 1211 , 1224-25, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Halverson v. Convenient Food Mart, Inc., 1974, N.D.Ill., 69 F.R.D. 331, 335-36 ; Abercrombie v. Lum’s, Inc., 1972, S.D.
discussed Cited "see" Vulcan Soc., Etc. v. Fire Dept., Etc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420, 428-30 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Underwood v. New York State Office of Court Administration, 23 E.P.D. ¶ 30,981 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (Haight, J.).
discussed Cited "see" Vulcan Society of Westchester County, Inc. v. Fire Department of White Plains
S.D.N.Y. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420, 428-30 (2d Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Underwood v. New York State Office of Court Administration, 23 E.
cited Cited "see" Alexander v. Bahou
N.D.N.Y. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally, Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 , 427, reh. en banc denied 531 F.2d 5 , cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Davis v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service
D.D.C. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Matheson, 532 F.2d 809, 814 (2d Cir.) (interprets Afroyim to require subjective intent), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 75 , 50 L.Ed.2d 185 (1976); 42 Op.Atty.
discussed Cited "see" Baker v. City of Detroit
E.D. Mich. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirkland v. New York Dept. of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 , reh. en banc denied, 531 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. v. Bridgeport Civil Service Comm., 482 F.2d 1333 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 991 , 95 S.Ct. 1997 , 44 L.Ed.2d 481 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" Watson v. Magee Women's Hospital
W.D. Pa. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirkland v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 , 425 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976), reh. denied, 429 U.S. 1124 , 97 S.Ct. 1162 , 51 L.Ed.2d 574 (1976), where Judge Van Graafeiland wrote: “Proof in employment discrimination cases proceeds from effect to cause.
cited Cited "see" Preston v. Thompson
7th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirkland v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Serv., 520 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Preston v. Thompson
7th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirkland v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Serv., 520 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976) 1 It is to be noted in the present litigation that there has been no determination made that the prisoners' Eighth Amendment rights to be free from cruel and unusual punishment have been violated 2 The fact that a party does not seek a stay of all parts of an injunction should not, it would seem, prevent that party from seeking a complete invalidation on appeal.
cited Cited "see" Jennings Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211, 1218-19 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Prate v. Freedman
2d Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); EEOC v. Local 638 . . .
cited Cited "see" ca2 1978
2d Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 520 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); EEOC v. Local 638 . . .
discussed Cited "see" Robbins Flooring, Inc. v. Federal Floors, Inc. (2×)
E.D. Pa. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Ralph E.. West v. Capitol Federal Savings And Loan Association (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
10th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Courtesy Chevrolet, Inc. v. Tennessee Walking Horse B. & E.A., 9 Cir., 393 F.2d 75, 77 , cert. denied 393 U.S. 938 , 89 S.Ct. 301 , 21 L.Ed.2d 274 . 17 In Hellerstein v. Mr. Steak, Inc., 10 Cir., 531 F.2d 470, 471 , cert. denied 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 75 , 50 L.Ed.2d 85 , we held that an order granting class action status is not appealable under § 1291.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Shaver v. Standard Oil Co.
Ohio Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of Am., Inc. (C.A3, 1975), 531 F.2d 1211 , 1217-1226, certiorari denied (1976), 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 ; Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp. (E.D.Pa.1984), 596 F.Supp. 62, 73-76 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Greene County Memorial Park v. Behm Funeral Homes, Inc.
W.D. Pa. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, Waldo v. North American Van Lines, Inc., 102 F.R.D. 807, 812 (W.D.Pa.1984); Waldo v. North American Van Lines, Inc., 669 F.Supp. 722, 727 (W.D.Pa.1987); see also, Ungar v. Dunkin Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211, 1223-24 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
E.D. Pa. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
As AMI acknowledges, the argument also requires evidence that "no factor other than the economic power of the seller explains this acceptance." A.M. at 35; see Fortner II, 429 U.S. at 618 n. 10, 97 S.Ct. at 867 n. 10; see also Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc., 531 F.2d 1211, 1225 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976) (proof of acceptance of a burdensome or uneconomic offer of a "tied” product is some evidence of coercion, but such proof alone does not establish, prima facie, the coercion element of a tying claim.) Accepting the continued viability …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Worsowicz v. Nashua Corp.
D.N.H. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Matheson, 400 F.Supp. 1241, 1247 (S.D.N.Y.1975), aff'd 532 F.2d 809 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 75 , 50 L.Ed.2d 85 *313 (1976) (executor of decedent’s estate stands in the same position as decedent).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Shaw v. Rodman Ford Truck Center, Inc.
Mass. App. Ct. · 1985 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Davis v. Marathon Oil Co., 528 F.2d 395, 403-404 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 (1976); Minnkota Power Coop. v. Manitowoc Co., 669 F.2d 525 , 528-529 (8th Cir. 1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Atkinson (2×)
Or. · 1984 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Turk, 526 F2d 654 (5th Cir) cert denied 429 US 823 , 97 S Ct 74 , 50 L Ed 2d 84 (1976) (none of valid objectives of inventory search require officers to play cassette tapes found in vehicle).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Kearns v. Ellis
Mass. App. Ct. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Davis v. Marathon Oil Co., 528 F.2d 395, 403 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 (1976); Tabatchnick v. G.
cited Cited "see, e.g." League of Martin v. City of Milwaukee
E.D. Wis. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Kirkland v. Department of Corrections, 520 F.2d 420 , (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." ca9 1981
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Kirkland v. Department of Correctional Services, 374 F.Supp. 1361, 1372 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff'd in part and rev'd in part on other grounds, 520 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976).
Turk
v.
United States
No. 75-1633.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
429 U.S. 823
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
6 passages pin-cited by 7 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 92%
Citer courts: First Circuit (2) · D. Connecticut (1) · District of Columbia (1) · D. Hawaii (1) · D. Massachusetts (1) · E.D. Pennsylvania (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.